Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Feb 13:15:143.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1495-x.

Impact of a passive social marketing intervention in community pharmacies on oral contraceptive and condom sales: a quasi-experimental study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Impact of a passive social marketing intervention in community pharmacies on oral contraceptive and condom sales: a quasi-experimental study

Karen B Farris et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Almost 50% of pregnancies in the United States are unwanted or mistimed. Notably, just over one-half of unintended pregnancies occurred when birth control was being used, suggesting inappropriate or poor use or contraceptive failure. About two-thirds of all women who are of reproductive age use contraceptives, and oral hormonal contraceptives remain the most common contraceptive method. Often, contraceptive products are obtained in community pharmacies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a pharmacy-based intervention would impact sales of contraceptive products in pharmacies.

Methods: This study was conducted in Iowa and used a quasi-experimental design including 55 community pharmacies (independent and grocery) in 12 counties as the intervention and 32 grocery pharmacies in 10 counties as a comparison group. The passive intervention was focused towards 18-30 year old women who visited community pharmacies and prompted those of childbearing age to "plan your pregnancy" and "consider using birth control". The intervention was delivered via educational tri-fold brochures, posters and 'shelf talkers.' Data sources for evaluation were contraceptive sales from intervention and comparison pharmacies, and a mixed negative binomial regression was used with study group*time interactions to examine the impact of the intervention on oral contraceptive and condom sales. Data from 2009 were considered baseline sales.

Results: From 2009 to 2011, condom sales decreased over time and oral contraceptives sales showed no change. Overall, the units sold were significantly higher in grocery pharmacies than in independent pharmacies for both contraceptive types. In the negative binomial regression for condoms, there was an overall significant interaction between the study group and time variables (p = 0.003), indicating an effect of the intervention, and there was a significant slowing in the drop of sales at time 3 in comparison with time 1 (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant association between pharmacy type and study group, where the independent intervention pharmacies had a higher proportion of stores with increases in condom sales compared to grocery pharmacies in the intervention or comparison group.

Conclusions: A passive community pharmacy-based public health intervention appeared to reduce the decrease in condom sales from baseline, particularly in independent pharmacies, but it did not impact oral contraceptive sales.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selected materials from the pharmacy-based social marketing campaign.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timeline of recruitment, intervention and data collection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Contraceptive sales interaction plots (Mean).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities. 2006. Contraception. 2011;84:478–85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayer JP. Unintended childbearing, maternal beliefs and delay of prenatal care. Birth. 1997;24:247–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00598.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orr ST, Miller CA, James SA, Babones S. Unintended pregnancy and preterm birth. Paed Perinatal Epid. 2000;14:309–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00289.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barber JS, Axinn WG, Thornton A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Hth Soc Behav. 1999;40:231–57. doi: 10.2307/2676350. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guttmacher Institute. Facts on unintended pregnancy in the United States. [http://www.cdc.gov/cdcgrandrounds/archives/2014/oct2014.htm]

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources