Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May-Aug;8(2):223-8.
doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.134516.

Thoracic spinal anesthesia is safe for patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery

Affiliations

Thoracic spinal anesthesia is safe for patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery

Mohamed Hamdy Ellakany. Anesth Essays Res. 2014 May-Aug.

Abstract

Aim: A double-blinded randomized controlled study to compare discharge time and patient satisfaction between two groups of patients submitted to open surgeries for abdominal malignancies using segmental thoracic spinal or general anesthesia.

Background: Open surgeries for abdominal malignancy are usually done under general anesthesia, but many patients with major medical problems sometimes can't tolerate such anesthesia. Regional anesthesia namely segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia may be beneficial in such patients.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients classified according to American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) as class II or III undergoing surgeries for abdominal malignancy, like colonic or gastric carcinoma, divided into two groups, 30 patients each. Group G, received general anesthesia, Group S received a segmental (T9-T10 injection) thoracic spinal anesthesia with intrathecal injection of 2 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (10 mg) and 20 ug fentanyl citrate. Intraoperative monitoring, postoperative pain, complications, recovery time, and patient satisfaction at follow-up were compared between the two groups.

Results: Spinal anesthesia was performed easily in all 30 patients, although two patients complained of paraesthesiae, which responded to slight needle withdrawal. No patient required conversion to general anesthesia, six patients required midazolam for anxiety and six patients required phenylephrine and atropine for hypotension and bradycardia, recovery was uneventful and without sequelae. The two groups were comparable with respect to gender, age, weight, height, body mass index, ASA classification, preoperative oxygen saturation and preoperative respiratory rate and operative time.

Conclusion: This preliminary study has shown that segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia can be used successfully and effectively for open surgeries for abdominal malignancies by experienced anesthetists. It showed shorter postanesthesia care unit stay, better postoperative pain relief and patient satisfaction than general anesthesia.

Keywords: Abdominal; anesthesia; general; malignancy; spinal; thoracic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Marik PE. Propofol: Therapeutic indications and side-effects. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:3639–49. - PubMed
    1. Mingus ML. Recovery advantages of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Adult patients. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7:628–33. - PubMed
    1. Rashiq S, Gallant B, Grace M, Jolly DT. Recovery characteristics following induction of anaesthesia with a combination of thiopentone and propofol. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:1166–71. - PubMed
    1. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: Results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321:1493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:4–10. - PubMed