Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Feb 10:16:21.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0477-6.

Single administration of intra-articular bupivacaine in arthroscopic knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Single administration of intra-articular bupivacaine in arthroscopic knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Qi-Bin Sun et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Single administration of intra-articular (IA) bupivacaine for pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery is effective, but its active duration and dose-response relationship is unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to summarize all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thus providing the most recent information on the safety and efficacy of single-administration IA bupivacaine for pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery, and to determine whether a dose-response relationship exists.

Methods: A systematic electronic literature search (through April 2014) was conducted to identify those RCTs that addressed the safety and efficacy of a single administration of IA bupivacaine for pain management after arthroscopic knee surgery. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine changes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at seven postoperative time points. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were carried out to assess the effects of various treatment factors on efficacy and to evaluate the dose-response relationship of bupivacaine. Weighted mean differences or relative risks were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model.

Results: Twenty-eight trials involving 1,560 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery met the inclusion criteria. The trials were subject to medium risk of bias. VAS scores at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively were significantly lower, the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia was smaller, and the time to first request for analgesia was longer in the IA bupivacaine group than in the placebo group. The analgesic effect of single-administration IA bupivacaine may be associated with the effect of concomitant administration of epinephrine and concentration of bupivacaine, and no dose-response relationship was identified. No significant difference in side effects was detected between groups.

Conclusions: Current evidence shows that the use of single-administration IA bupivacaine is effective for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery, with satisfactory short-term safety. Low-dose administration of IA bupivacaine 0.5% combined with epinephrine adjuvant in clinical practice should be performed. Additional high-quality RCTs with longer follow-up periods are required to examine the safety of single-administration IA bupivacaine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart showing the selection of studies for meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of meta-analysis: VAS scores (0–10 points) representing postoperative pain intensity at different time points. VAS: visual analog scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Influence of removing studies one by one on adjusted effect estimates for 24-h-postoperative VAS scores. Circles are effect estimates and horizontal dotted lines are 95% confidence intervals for meta-analysis of the remaining studies; the vertical center line is the pooled effect estimate for all studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Meta-regression analyses of (A) use of supplemental epinephrine and (B) concentration of bupivacaine. Size of the circles corresponds to the weight of each study.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Dose–response effect of bupivacaine. Log of the relative risk of number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia in 19 trials of bupivacaine versus placebo by bupivacaine dose, together with a summary random-effects meta-regression. The area of each circle is inversely proportional to the variance of the log of the relative-risk estimate.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of meta-analysis. Side effects.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Tests for publication bias for relative risk of the number of patients requiring supplementary analgesia.

References

    1. Wei J, Yang H, Qin J, Kong F, Yang T. Single-dose intra-articular bupivacaine after knee arthroscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled studies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(7):1517–28. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2543-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henderson RC, Campion ER, DeMasi RA, Taft TN. Postarthroscopy analgesia with bupivacaine. A prospective, randomized, blinded evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:614–7. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800610. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milligan KA, Mowbray MJ, Mulrooney L, Standen PJ. Intra-articular bupivacaine for pain relief after arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint in daycase patients. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:563–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06688.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Møiniche S, Mikkelsen S, Wetterslev J, Dahl JB. A systematic review of intra-articular local anesthesia for postoperative pain relief after arthroscopic knee surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24(5):430–7. doi: 10.1097/00115550-199924050-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raja SN, Dickstein RE, Johnson CA. Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of intraarticular bupivacaine and morphine following arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(6):1143–7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199212000-00015. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources