Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 25887598
- PMCID: PMC4369090
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0510-9
Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Besides magnetic resonance imaging, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) seems the most reliable tool to evaluate body composition and is often considered as the gold standard in clinical practice. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) could provide a simpler, portative, and less expensive alternative. Because the body composition assessment by BIA is device-dependent, the aim of this study was to appraise the concordance between the specific bioelectrical impedance device InBody S10 and DXA for the body composition evaluation.
Methods: Body composition, included appendicular lean mass divided by height squared (ALM/ht(2)) was measured by DXA (Hologic QDR Discovery device) and by BIA (InBody S10 Biospace device). Agreement between tools was assessed by means of the Bland Altman method and reliability was determined using the IntraClass Coefficient (ICC). ICC was also computed to assess the reliability of the test-retest performed by the same operator or by two different ones.
Results: A total of 219 subjects were enrolled in this study (mean age: 43.7 ± 19.1 years old, 51.6% of women). For the ALM/ht(2), reliability of the test-retest of the BIA was high with an ICC of 0.89 (95%CI: 0.86-0.92) when performed by the same operator and an ICC of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.72-0.82) when performed by two different operators. Agreement between ALM/ht(2) assessed by DXA and BIA was low (ICC = 0.37 (95%CI: 0.25-0.48)). Mean ALM/ht(2) was 9.19 ± 1.39 kg/m(2) with BIA and 7.34 ± 1.34 kg/m(2) with DXA, (p < 0001). A formula developed using a multiple regression analysis, and taking into account muscle mass assessed by BIA, as well as sex and body mass index, explains 89% of the ALM/ht(2) assessed by DXA.
Conclusions: Although our results show that the measure of ALM/ht(2) by BIA is reliable, the agreement between DXA and BIA is low. Indeed, BIA seems to overestimate ALM/ht(2) compared to DXA and, consequently, it is important to use an adapted formula to obtain measurement of the appendicular lean mass by BIA close to that measured by DXA.
Similar articles
-
Bioelectrical impedance analysis as an alternative to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of fat mass and appendicular lean mass in patients with obesity.Nutrition. 2022 Jan;93:111442. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111442. Epub 2021 Jul 30. Nutrition. 2022. PMID: 34482097
-
Dual-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis is Accurate and Reliable to Determine Lean Muscle Mass in The Elderly.J Clin Densitom. 2023 Jan-Mar;26(1):90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 13. J Clin Densitom. 2023. PMID: 36567160
-
Developing and Validating an Age-Independent Equation Using Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Estimation of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass and Establishing a Cutoff for Sarcopenia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 19;14(7):809. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070809. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28753945 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the older adults with metabolic syndrome: equipment-specific equation development.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Dec 27;37(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02898-1. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024. PMID: 39725814 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measurement of lean body mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a consideration of the pros and cons.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Aug;29(4):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0622-6. Epub 2016 Aug 27. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017. PMID: 27568020 Review.
Cited by
-
Skeletal muscle loss and body composition in progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253079. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34111224 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 10;10(12):2499. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122499. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36554023 Free PMC article.
-
Establishment of muscle mass-based indications for the cystatin C test in renal function evaluation.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 30;9:1021936. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1021936. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36530922 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons between Bioelectrical Impedance Variables, Functional Tests and Blood Markers Based on BMI in Older Women and Their Association with Phase Angle.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;19(11):6851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116851. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35682434 Free PMC article.
-
Body composition, muscle function, and physical performance in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a prospective cohort study.Respir Res. 2019 Mar 12;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1019-9. Respir Res. 2019. PMID: 30866948 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources