Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 1;194(11):5120-8.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403181. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

IFN-β Selectively Inhibits IL-2 Production through CREM-Mediated Chromatin Remodeling

Affiliations

IFN-β Selectively Inhibits IL-2 Production through CREM-Mediated Chromatin Remodeling

Dennis C Otero et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

IFN-β is widely used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis, yet the mechanism facilitating its efficacy remains unclear. IL-2 production by activated T cells, including those mediating autoimmunity, and subsequent autocrine stimulation is vital for T cell expansion and function. In this study, we demonstrate that in mouse and human T cells, IFN-β specifically inhibits the production of IL-2 upon TCR engagement without affecting other cytokines or activation markers. Rather than disrupting TCR signaling, IFN-β alters histone modifications in the IL-2 promoter to retain the locus in an inaccessible configuration. This in turn is mediated through the upregulation of the transcriptional suppressor CREM by IFN-β and consequent recruitment of histone deacetylases to the IL-2 promoter. In accordance, ablation of CREM expression or inhibition of histone deacetylases activity eliminates the suppressive effects of IFN-β on IL-2 production. Collectively, these findings provide a molecular basis by which IFN-β limits T cell responses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Specific inhibition of IL-2 expression by IFNβ
(A) Splenocytes from wild type 129/SvEv mice were treated with or without IFNβ or IFNγ for 16 h and then stimulated with 10 μg/mL immobilized anti-CD3 and 2 μg/mL anti-CD28 for 5 h followed by intracellular staining for IL-2. Upper plots were gated on live CD4+ cells and lower plots were gated on live CD8+ cells and are representative of at least five experiments. (B) Splenocytes from wild type 129/SvEv mice were treated for 16 h with IFNβ and stimulated with PMA/Ionomycin for 5 h followed by intracellular stain for IL-2. Plots are gated on live CD4+ cells. (C) Splenocytes were stimulated with the indicated mitogens and cultured for 48 h in the presence of increasing doses of IFNβ. IL-2 in the conditioned medium was quantified by ELISA (n=3). (D) CD4+ splenocytes were treated for 16 h with IFNβ prior to stimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28. 6 h later RNA was purified and quantitative PCR was used to measure IL-2 and IL-4 mRNA levels (n=3). (E) CD4+ splenocytes were treated as in (C), stained for CD25 and CD44 expression and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Inhibition of IL-2 expression requires pre-treatment with IFNβ
(A) Purified CD4+ splenic T cells were treated with IFNβ for 16 h (lower plots) before (middle plots) or after (right plots) 3 days in culture with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 and then re-stimulated with PMA/Ionomycin for 5 h followed by intracellular stain for IL-2. (B) Splenocytes were cultured for a total of 4 days following stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. IFNβ was added up to 12 h prior to or up to 12 h post stimulation. The amount of IL-2 in the conditioned medium was measured by ELISA (n=3).
Figure 3
Figure 3. IFNβ inhibition of IL-2 expression is independent of Treg cells and is reproduced in human peripheral blood leukocytes
(A) CD4+ T cells were depleted of CD25+ Treg cells and then treated for 16 h with IFNβ followed by stimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 4 h in the presence or absence of CD25+ Treg cells. IL-2 mRNA was measured by quantitative PCR. (n=3) (B) Human PBLs were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 dynabeads with and without IFNβ pretreatment and RNA was collected after 3 h stimulation and analyzed for IL-2 message by quantitative PCR. (n=3) (C) Human PBLs were stimulated as in (b) except that cells were stained for intracellular IL-2 after 5 h. (representative of five experiments).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Inhibition of IL-2 by IFNβ in naive T cells is dependent on STAT1 but does not affect proximal signaling through the T cell receptor
(A) Splenocytes from wild type and STAT1−/−, Tyk2−/−, STAT3−/− and STAT5−/− mice were treated with IFNβ for 16 h and then stimulated with PMA/Ionomycin for 5 h followed by intracellular IL-2 stain. Plots are gated on CD4+ cells. Representative of 3-5 mice each. (B) Splenic T cells were treated for 16 h with IFNβ and then stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 for the indicated time. Western blots of whole cell lysates were carried out and probed for the indicated phosphorylated proteins. (C) Splenic T cells, treated for 16 h with IFNβ and then loaded with Fluo-4 and Fura Red, were run on flow cytometer for 30 sec to establish baseline, and then stimulated with anti-CD3. After 1 min, a crosslinking antibody was added to cells to induce calcium flux (representative of at least five experiments).
Figure 5
Figure 5. IFNβ affects chromatin remodeling of the IL-2 promoter through histone deacetylase activity and CREM
(A) Diagram showing location of primers in the IL-2 promoter used in the subsequent figures. (B) Chromatin accessibility of the IL-2 promoter/enhancer. Purified CD4+ T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 4 h with and without IFNβ pretreatment. Chromatin accessibility was determined by quantitation of the qPCR products obtained with the indicated primer sets. (n=4) (C) Chromatin IPs using anti-acetylated H3 and anti-acetylated H4 antibodies and primers within the IL-2 promoter/enhancer following stimulation of CD4+ T cells with either anti-CD3/CD28 or PMA/Ionomycin. (D) IL-2 mRNA was quantitated from CD4+ T cells following 3 h anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation with or without IFNβ pre-treatment. Increasing doses of Trichostatin A were added to cells 1 h prior to stimulation. Left graph is a representative of three independent experiments the average % inhibition of which in shown on the right. (E) CD4+ T cells were treated with IFNβ for 16 h and Western blots of cell lysates were probed for CREM, ISG15, and GAPDH as a loading control. (F) mRNAs for CREM and ISG15 were measured in CD4+ T cells from 129WT or STAT1−/− mice stimulated with IFNβ for 5 h as measured by quantitative PCR. (G) and (H) CD4+ T cells were transfected with control or CREM-specific siRNA prior to treatment with IFNβ for 16 h and subsequent stimulation with anti-CD3/CD28 for 3 h. (G) CREM mRNA and (H) IL-2 mRNA was measured by quantitative PCR. (H) The average % inhibition of IL-2 production was determined from 4 independent experiments.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Inhibition of IL-2 production in T cells from mice injected with IFNβ or infected with LCMV Cl13
(A) OTII TCR transgenic mice were injected with 100ug Ova323-339 24 h after I.V. injection of 10,000 U IFNβ. Splenic T cells were collected 4 h following peptide injection and subjected to intracellular stain for IL-2. Cells were also analyzed for surface expression of Vα2/Vβ5 TCR chains as well as the activation marker CD69. (B) Graph represents average number of IL-2 positive OTII T cells from three independent experiments. (C) Single cell suspensions from spleens of Day 9 LCMV Cl13 infected mice were subjected to intracellular stain for CREM. CD4+ cells are shown. (D) Graph represents % CREM positive CD4 T cells from 5 uninfected and 7 LCMV Cl13 infected mice stained as in (b). (E) Single cell suspensions from spleens of Day 9 LCMV Cl13 infected mice were stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads for 5 h and then intracellular stained for IL-2. (F) Graph represents % IL-2 positive CD4 T cells from 4 mice each uninfected and LCMV Cl13 infected mice stained as in (d).

References

    1. Kieseier BC. The mechanism of action of interferon-beta in relapsing multiple sclerosis. CNS drugs. 2011;25:491–502. - PubMed
    1. Moro H, Otero DC, Tanabe Y, David M. T cell-intrinsic and - extrinsic contributions of the IFNAR/STAT1-axis to thymocyte survival. PloS one. 2011;6:e24972. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Otero DC, Baker DP, David M. IRF7-dependent IFN-beta production in response to RANKL promotes medullary thymic epithelial cell development. Journal of immunology. 2013;190:3289–3298. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le Bon A, Tough DF. Links between innate and adaptive immunity via type I interferon. Current opinion in immunology. 2002;14:432–436. - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez-Navajas JM, Lee J, David M, Raz E. Immunomodulatory functions of type I interferons. Nature reviews. Immunology. 2012;12:125–135. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms