Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar 25:8:94.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1034-y.

Troubleshooting during a challenging high-risk pacemaker lead extraction: a case report and review of the literature

Jacques Rizkallah  1 , William Kent  2 , Vikas Kuriachan  3 , John Burgess  4 , Derek Exner  5
Affiliations
Review

Troubleshooting during a challenging high-risk pacemaker lead extraction: a case report and review of the literature

Jacques Rizkallah et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: The use of cardiac implantable electrical devices continues to increase with the validation of new beneficial indications. While the risks of device implantation decreased significantly over time, significant risk remains associated with their extraction when indicated. A high-risk pacemaker lead extraction case is described, wherein a chronically implanted lead that had perforated the right atrium was successfully removed without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass. In this report we share our approach to this challenging extraction case and describe an infrequently utilized off-pump hybrid technique that we term the "lead-inverting stitch".

Case presentation: A 74 year-old Caucasian woman with complete heart block and remote pacemaker implantation presents with a swollen and erythematous infected pacemaker pocket necessitating device extraction. Chest computerized tomographic imaging revealed a chronically perforating right atrial lead tip approximately 2 cm within the pericardial space. A successful hybrid transvenous and open surgical extraction approach was undertaken without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass; this was made possible due to a successfully positioned "lead-inverting stitch".

Conclusion: Implantable cardiac electrical device infections are amongst the most dreaded post implant complications. Risks of device extraction are further complicated in cases of chronic lead perforations. Extraction strategies that avoid cardiopulmonary bypass initiation are preferred.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Non-contrast computerized tomography image depicting the extravascular portion of the right atrial pacemaker lead (arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Midline sternotomy depicting the pacemaker lead perforation through the right atrium (white arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of the “lead inverting stitch”. A. Purse-string suture applied around the perforating lead. B. Atrial lead-tip severed with heavy scissors followed by inversion of the remnant atrial lead fragment and surrounding scar beneath the tightened purse-string. Note: the epicardial pacing lead is already in place. C. Cross-section illustration of the severed and inverted atrial lead following tightening of the purse string around the lead (i.e., “lead inverting stitch”).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009; a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34(8):1013–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03150.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkfeldt RE, Johansen JB, Nohr EA, Jorgensen OD, Nielsen JC. Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(18):1186–94. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht511. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunner MP, Cronin EM, Duarte VE, Tarakji KG, Martin DO, Callahan T, et al. Clinical predictors of adverse patient outcomes in an experience of more than 5000 chronic endovascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extractions. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(5):799–805. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parkash R, Crystal E, Bashir J, Simpson C, Birnie D, Sterns L, et al. Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: Report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee. Circ. 2010;121:2384–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924357. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Byrd CL, Bongiorni MG, Carrillo RG, Crossley GH 3rd, et al. Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications and patient management. Heart Rhyhtm. 2009;6(7):1085–104. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.05.020. - DOI - PubMed