Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;6(2):61-78.
doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2015.553.

Job demand and control interventions: a stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews on workplace disability

K Williams-Whitt  1 , M I White, S L Wagner, I Z Schultz, C Koehn, C E Dionne, M Koehoorn, H Harder, R Pasca, O Warje, V Hsu, L McGuire, W Schulz, D Kube, A Hook, M D Wright
Affiliations

Job demand and control interventions: a stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews on workplace disability

K Williams-Whitt et al. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Physical and psychological job demands in combination with the degree of control a worker has over task completion, play an important role in reducing stress. Occupational stress is an important, modifiable factor affecting work disability. However, the effectiveness of reducing job demands or increasing job control remains unclear, particularly for outcomes of interest to employers, such as absenteeism or productivity.

Objective: This systematic review reports on job demand and control interventions that impact absenteeism, productivity and financial outcomes.

Methods: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis was conducted with researcher and stakeholder collaboration throughout. Databases and grey literature were searched for systematic reviews between 2000 and 2012: Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, TRIP, health-evidence.ca, Rehab+, National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC), and Institute for Work and Health. Articles were assessed independently by two researchers for inclusion criteria and methodological quality. Differences were resolved through consensus.

Results: The search resulted in 3363 unique titles. After review of abstracts, 115 articles were retained for full-text review. 11 articles finally met the inclusion criteria and are summarized in this synthesis. The best level of evidence we found indicates that multimodal job demand reductions for either at-work or off-work workers will reduce disability-related absenteeism.

Conclusion: In general, the impacts of interventions that aim to reduce job demands or increase job control can be positive for the organization in terms of reducing absenteeism, increasing productivity and cost-effectiveness. However, more high quality research is needed to further assess the relationships and quantify effect sizes for the interventions and outcomes reviewed in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Appendix B:
Appendix B:
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. De Croon E, Sluiter J, Nijssen T. et al. Predictive factors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1362–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Detaille S, Heerkens Y, Engels J. et al. Common prognostic factors of work disability among employees with a chronic somatic disease: A systematic review of cohort studies. Scan J Work Environ Health. 2009;35:261–81. - PubMed
    1. Duijts S, Kant I, Swaen G. et al. A meta-analysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:1105–15. - PubMed
    1. Michie S, Williams S. Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: A systematic literature review. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:3–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steenstra I, Verbeek J, Heymans M, Bongers P. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: A systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:851–60. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources