Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Nov;41(5):393-400.
doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Are third-trimester adipokines associated with higher metabolic risk among women with gestational diabetes?

Affiliations
Observational Study

Are third-trimester adipokines associated with higher metabolic risk among women with gestational diabetes?

D Honnorat et al. Diabetes Metab. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to determine whether third-trimester adipokines during gestational diabetes (GDM) are associated with higher metabolic risk.

Methods: A total of 221 women with GDM (according to IADPSG criteria) were enrolled between 2011/11 and 2013/6 into a prospective observational study (IMAGE), and categorized as having elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG, n = 36) if levels were ≥ 92 mg/dL during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, n = 116) if FBG was < 92 mg/dL but with elevated 1-h or 2-h OGTT values, or impaired fasting and stimulated blood glucose (IFSG, n = 69) if both FBG was ≥ 92 mg/dL and 1-h or 2-h OGTT values were elevated.

Results: Pre-gestational body mass index (BMI) was higher in women with IFG or IFSG compared with IGT (P < 0.001), as were leptin levels in women with IFG vs IGT [34.7 (10.5-119.7) vs 26.6 (3.56-79.4) ng/L; P = 0.008]. HOMA2-IR scores were higher in women with IFG or IFSG vs IGT (1.87 ± 1.2 or 1.72 ± 0.9 vs 1.18 ± 0.8, respectively; P < 0.001). Also, those with IFSG vs those with IGT had significantly lower HOMA2-B scores (111.4 ± 41.3 vs 127.1 ± 61.6, respectively; P < 0.05) and adiponectin levels [5.00 (1.11-11.3) vs 6.19 (2.11-17.7) μg/mL; P < 0.001], and higher levels of IL-6 [1.14 (0.33-20.0) vs 0.90 (0.31-19.0); P = 0.012] and TNF-α [0.99 (0.50-10.5) vs 0.84 (0.45-11.5) pg/mL; P = 0.003]. After adjusting for age, parity, and pre-gestational and gestational BMI, the difference in adiponectin levels remained significant.

Conclusion: Diagnosing GDM by IADSPG criteria results in a wide range of heterogeneity. Our study has indicated that adipokine levels in addition to FBG may help to select women at high metabolic risk for appropriate monitoring and post-delivery interventions (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCP02133729).

Keywords: Adipokines; Cytokines; Gestational diabetes; Metabolic syndrome; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms