Transition from film to digital mammography: impact for breast cancer screening through the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program
- PMID: 25891052
- PMCID: PMC4405659
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.11.010
Transition from film to digital mammography: impact for breast cancer screening through the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program
Abstract
Introduction: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides mammograms and diagnostic services for low-income, uninsured women aged 40-64 years. Mammography facilities within the NBCCEDP gradually shifted from plain-film to digital mammography. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of replacing film with digital mammography on health effects (deaths averted, life-years gained [LYG]); costs (for screening and diagnostics); and number of women reached.
Methods: NBCCEDP 2010 data and data representative of the program's target population were used in two established microsimulation models. Models simulated observed screening behavior including different screening intervals (annual, biennial, irregular) and starting ages (40, 50 years) for white, black, and Hispanic women. Model runs were performed in 2012.
Results: The models predicted 8.0-8.3 LYG per 1,000 film screens for black women, 5.9-7.5 for white women, and 4.0-4.5 for Hispanic women. For all race/ethnicity groups, digital mammography had more LYG than film mammography (2%-4%), but had higher costs (34%-35%). Assuming a fixed budget, 25%-26% fewer women could be served, resulting in 22%-24% fewer LYG if all mammograms were converted to digital. The loss in LYG could be reversed to an 8%-13% increase by only including biennial screening.
Conclusions: Digital could result in slightly more LYG than film mammography. However, with a fixed budget, fewer women may be served with fewer LYG. Changes in the program, such as only including biennial screening, will increase LYG/screen and could offset the potential decrease in LYG when shifting to digital mammography.
Copyright © 2015 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Jemal A, Simard EP, Dorell C, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2009, Featuring the Burden and Trends in Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Associated Cancers and HPV Vaccination Coverage Levels. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(3):175–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs491. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1784–1792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050518. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sabatino SA, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Breen N, Tangka F, Shaw KM. Disparities in mammography use among U.S. women aged 40–64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Med Care. 2008;46(7):692–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817893b1. - DOI - PubMed
-
- CDC. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/about.htm. - PubMed
-
- CDC. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/data/summaries/national_aggregate.htm. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical