Is cholecystectomy a reasonable treatment option for simple gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm?
- PMID: 25892875
- PMCID: PMC4394086
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4248
Is cholecystectomy a reasonable treatment option for simple gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm?
Abstract
Aim: To determine the relevance of the 10-mm size criterion of the generally accepted surgical indication for gallbladder polyps (GBPs).
Methods: We collected data of patients who were confirmed to have GBPs through cholecystectomy at Samsung Medical Center between January 1997 and December 2012. Among the patients who underwent cholecystectomy for GBP, those with a definite evidence for malignancy such as adjacent organ invasion, metastasis on preoperative imaging studies, polyp larger than 20 mm, absence of preoperative imaging study results, and patients having gallstones were excluded. We retrospectively collected and analyzed information on patient's clinical characteristics, symptoms, ultrasonographic findings, and blood laboratory tests.
Results: A total of 836 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Seven hundred eighty patients (93%) had benign polyps, whereas 56 patients (7%) had malignant polyps. Of the 56 patients with malignancy, 4 patients (7%) had borderline GBP (10-12 mm) and a patient had small GBP (< 10 mm) with T2 stage. We conducted an ROC curve analysis to verify the 10-mm size criteria (AUC = 0.887, SD = 0.21, P < 0.001). In the ROC curve for polyp size and malignancy, sensitivity and specificity of the 10-mm size criterion was 98.2% and 19.6%, respectively. The specificity of the 11-mm and 12-mm size criteria was 44.6% and 56%, respectively, whereas the sensitivity of these two size criteria was similar. We defined the GBPs of 10 to 12 mm as a borderline-sized GBP, which were found in 411 patients (49%). In this group, there was a significant difference in age between patients with benign and malignant GBPs (47 years vs 60 years, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: GBPs larger than 13 mm need immediate excision whereas for borderline-sized GBPs detected in young patients, careful medical observation can be a rational decision.
Keywords: Borderline-sized gallbladder polyp; Cholecystectomy; Gallbladder cancer; Gallbladder polyp; Polyp size.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Predictive factors of neoplastic gallbladder polyps: Outcomes of 278 patients.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;28(3):202-206. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.16698. Epub 2017 Mar 17. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28316322
-
Predictive Model for Neoplastic Potential of Gallbladder Polyp.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;52(3):273-276. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000900. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 28742730
-
Gallbladder polypoid lesions >15mm as indicators of T1b gallbladder cancer risk.Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;18(3):156-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 27. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28958638
-
Malignant transformation of a 5-mm gallbladder polyp over 2 years: a case report and review of current literature.Ultrasound Q. 2015 Mar;31(1):66-8. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000094. Ultrasound Q. 2015. PMID: 25054905 Review.
-
[Surgical indications in gallbladder polyps].Cir Esp. 2013 May;91(5):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Dec 13. Cir Esp. 2013. PMID: 23245932 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis.Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4954-1. Epub 2017 Jul 7. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 28687913
-
Risk stratification of gallbladder masses by machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics models: a prospective and multi-institutional study.Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8899-8911. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09891-8. Epub 2023 Jul 20. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37470825
-
Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE.Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3358-3368. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w. Epub 2021 Dec 17. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34918177 Free PMC article.
-
Interpretation, Reporting, Imaging-Based Workups, and Surveillance of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening: 2025 Recommendations From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.Korean J Radiol. 2025 Feb;26(2):102-134. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0914. Korean J Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39898393 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A practical contrast-enhanced ultrasound risk prediction of gallbladder polyp: differentiation of adenoma from cholesterol polyp lesion.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb;50(2):747-756. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04566-4. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 39254706 No abstract available.
References
-
- Konstantinidis IT, Bajpai S, Kambadakone AR, Tanabe KK, Berger DL, Zheng H, Sahani DV, Lauwers GY, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, et al. Gallbladder lesions identified on ultrasound. Lessons from the last 10 years. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:549–553. - PubMed
-
- Boulton RA, Adams DH. Gallbladder polyps: when to wait and when to act. Lancet. 1997;349:817. - PubMed
-
- Okamoto M, Okamoto H, Kitahara F, Kobayashi K, Karikome K, Miura K, Matsumoto Y, Fujino MA. Ultrasonographic evidence of association of polyps and stones with gallbladder cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:446–450. - PubMed
-
- Mainprize KS, Gould SW, Gilbert JM. Surgical management of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Br J Surg. 2000;87:414–417. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials