Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Apr 22:12:66.
doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0287-3.

Whole genome sequence comparison of ten diagnostic brucellaphages propagated on two Brucella abortus hosts

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Whole genome sequence comparison of ten diagnostic brucellaphages propagated on two Brucella abortus hosts

Ekaterine Tevdoradze et al. Virol J. .

Abstract

Background: Recently the genome sequences of two brucellaphages, isolated in Georgia (Tb) and Mexico (Pr) were reported revealing pronounced sequence homogeneity and the presence of two major indels discriminating the two phages. Subsequent genome sequencing of six diagnostic brucellaphages: Tbilisi (Tb), Firenze (Fz), Weybridge (Wb), S708, Berkeley (Bk) and R/C phages identified three major genetic groups. However, the propensity for fine-scale genetic variability of diverse brucellaphages grown on multiple hosts within a single Brucella species remains unknown.

Methods: We sequenced the complete genomes of ten brucellaphages following initial propagation on B. abortus strain 141 and after subsequent propagation on B. abortus strain S19. All brucellaphages were isolated and propagated at the Eliava Institute including the original Tb phage. Genomic libraries were quantified using the Qbit and sheared on the Covaris M220. QC for fragmentation was performed on the BioAnalyzer 2100. DNA libraries were prepared using an Illumina Paired-End protocol and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq. Sequence analysis was performed using Geneious and MEGA software.

Results: Comparative whole genome sequence analysis revealed genetic homogeneity consistent with previously published data as well as multiple nucleotide variations. Genomic changes as a result of passages were observed in similar genes and predominantly occurred at identical sites in separate phages. Multiple instances of within-sample genetic heterogeneity were observed often at shared genomics positions across phages. Positive selection was detected in the tail collar protein gene. We also identified a Staphylothermus marinus F1-like CRISPR spacer and sequences orthologous to both prophage antirepressors of Brucella spp. and intergenic sequences encoded by Ochrobactrum anthropi.

Conclusion: We surveyed whole genome level diversity in phage lytic for B. abortus as they are propagated on alternate vaccine strains within the species. Our data extend previous results indicating select variable hotspots and broad genomic homogeneity as well as multiple common polymorphisms and within-sample variation. These data also provide additional genomes for future reference in comparative studies involving the molecular evolution and host specificity of brucellaphages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Whole genome alignments of all genomes analyzed in this study. SNPs are indicated by vertical black lines, phages are designated by phage ID number followed by underscore and propagating host strain name. Open Reading Frames number and location are illustrated above the alignment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Whole genome unrooted Neighbor-Joining dendrograms for twenty brucellaphage strains based on whole genome sequences. NJ-based phylogenetic reconstructions (majority greedy clustering) comprising phage grown on B. abortus strain 141 and S19. Scale bars represent Nei’s genetic distance metric, values on horizontal branches represent bootstrap probabilities (1000 replicates).

References

    1. Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, Schelling E, Zinsstag J. Global burden of human brucellosis: a systematic review of disease frequency. PLoSNegl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001865. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg E, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, Lory S, DeLong E. The Prokaryotes - A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria. Springer-Verlag New York, LLC 2006, Vol. 5: Proteobacteria: Alpha and Beta Subclasses. 3rd Edition.
    1. Corbel MJ, Thomas EL. The Brucella-Phages: Their Properties, Characterization and Applications. In: Booklet 2266, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pinner, Middlesex, UK. 1980.
    1. Jones LM, Merz GS, Wilson JB. Phage typing reactions on brucella species. Appl Microbiol. 1968;16(8):1179–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDuff CR, Jones LM, Wilson JB. Characteristics of brucellaphage. J Bacteriol. 1962;83(2):324–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types