Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0125196.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125196. eCollection 2015.

Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes

Affiliations

Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes

Jennifer Baltich et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

To date it has been thought that shoe midsole hardness does not affect vertical impact peak forces during running. This conclusion is based partially on results from experimental data using homogeneous samples of participants that found no difference in vertical impact peaks when running in shoes with different midsole properties. However, it is currently unknown how apparent joint stiffness is affected by shoe midsole hardness. An increase in apparent joint stiffness could result in a harder landing, which should result in increased vertical impact peaks during running. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of shoe midsole hardness on apparent ankle and knee joint stiffness and the associated vertical ground reaction force for age and sex subgroups during heel-toe running. 93 runners (male and female) aged 16-75 years ran at 3.33 ± 0.15 m/s on a 30 m-long runway with soft, medium and hard midsole shoes. The vertical impact peak increased as the shoe midsole hardness decreased (mean(SE); soft: 1.70BW(0.03), medium: 1.64BW(0.03), hard: 1.54BW(0.03)). Similar results were found for the apparent ankle joint stiffness where apparent stiffness increased as the shoe midsole hardness decreased (soft: 2.08BWm/º x 100 (0.05), medium: 1.92 BWm/º x 100 (0.05), hard: 1.85 BWm/º x 100 (0.05)). Apparent knee joint stiffness increased for soft (1.06BWm/º x 100 (0.04)) midsole compared to the medium (0.95BWm/º x 100 (0.04)) and hard (0.96BWm/º x 100 (0.04)) midsoles for female participants. The results from this study confirm that shoe midsole hardness can have an effect on vertical impact force peaks and that this may be connected to the hardness of the landing. The results from this study may provide useful information regarding the development of cushioning guidelines for running shoes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Marker Set Up.
Frontal view of retro-reflective marker placement on the shoe, shank, thigh and pelvis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Methods.
A) Illustration of apparent ankle joint stiffness (stiffness = slope), and B) vertical force during running highlighting the impact peak during the first part of stance.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Vertical Impact Peak.
Average vertical impact peak force (mean ± SEM) for the soft (blue), medium (red) and hard (green) midsole shoes for the female participants (left) and male participants (right). Significant differences were found between soft, medium and hard midsole shoes. Covariates were evaluated at the following values: weight = 66.7kg, Height = 170.9cm.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Apparent Ankle Stiffness.
Average apparent ankle joint stiffness (mean ± SEM) for the soft (blue), medium (red) and hard (green) midsole shoes for the female participants (left) and male participants (right). Significant differences were found between soft, medium and hard midsole shoes. Covariates were evaluated at the following values: weight = 66.7kg, Height = 170.9cm.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Apparent Knee Stiffness.
Average apparent knee joint stiffness (mean ± SEM) for the soft (blue), medium (red) and hard (green) midsole shoes for the female participants (left) and male participants (right). Significant differences were found between the soft midsole and the medium and hard midsoles for the female participants and between the soft midsole and the medium midsole for the male participants. Covariates were evaluated at the following values: weight = 66.7kg, Height = 170.9cm.

References

    1. Creby M, Dixson S. External frontal plane loads may be associated with tibial stress fracture. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2008; 40: 1669–1674. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817571ae - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grimston S, Engsberg R, Kloiber R, Hanley D. Bone mass, external loads, and stress fracture in female runners. Hum. Perform. 1991; 7: 293–302.
    1. Milner C, Ferber R, Pollard C, Hamill J, Davis I. Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 323–328. - PubMed
    1. Zifchock R, Davis I, Hamill J. Kinetic asymmetry in female runners with and without retrospective tibial stress fractures. J. Biomech. 2006; 39: 2792–2797. - PubMed
    1. Nigg BM, Bahlsen H, Luethi S, Stokes S. The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe-running. J. Biomech. 1987; 20: 951–959. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources