Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr 17;20(4):7000-16.
doi: 10.3390/molecules20047000.

Perinatal asphyxia: a review from a metabolomics perspective

Affiliations
Review

Perinatal asphyxia: a review from a metabolomics perspective

Claudia Fattuoni et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Perinatal asphyxia is defined as an oxygen deprivation that occurs around the time of birth, and may be caused by several perinatal events. This medical condition affects some four million neonates worldwide per year, causing the death of one million subjects. In most cases, infants successfully recover from hypoxia episodes; however, some patients may develop HIE, leading to permanent neurological conditions or impairment of different organs and systems. Given its multifactor dependency, the timing, severity and outcome of this disease, mainly assessed through Sarnat staging, are of difficult evaluation. Moreover, although the latest newborn resuscitation guideline suggests the use of a 21% oxygen concentration or room air, such an approach is still under debate. Therefore, the pathological mechanism is still not clear and a golden standard treatment has yet to be defined. In this context, metabolomics, a new discipline that has described important perinatal issues over the last years, proved to be a useful tool for the monitoring, the assessment, and the identification of potential biomarkers associated with asphyxia events. This review covers metabolomics research on perinatal asphyxia condition, examining in detail the studies reported both on animal and human models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

    1. Lawn J.E., Cousens S., Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhatti A., Kumar P. Systemic effects of perinatal asphyxia. Indian J. Pediatr. 2014;81:231–233. doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-1328-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell D.E., Imaizumi S.O., Bernbaum J.C. Health and developmental outcomes of infants requiring neonatal intensive care. In: McInerny T.K., Adam H.M., Campbell D.E., Kamat D.M., Kelleher K.J., editors. American Academy of Pediatrics Textbook of Pediatric Care. AAP; Elk Grove Village, IL, USA: 2008. pp. 852–866.
    1. Hansmann G. Neonatal resuscitation on air: It is time to turn down the oxygen tanks? Lancet. 2004;364:1293–1294. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17203-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wyllie J., Perlman J.M., Kattwinkel J., Atkins D.L., Chameides L., Goldsmith J.P., Guinsburg R., Hazinski M.F., Morley C., Richmond S., et al. On behalf of the Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators. Part 11: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2010;81:e260–e287. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.029. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources