Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Apr 21;9(5):1071-9.
doi: 10.1177/1932296815583059.

Safe and Effective Use of the Once Weekly Dulaglutide Single-Dose Pen in Injection-Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safe and Effective Use of the Once Weekly Dulaglutide Single-Dose Pen in Injection-Naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Glenn Matfin et al. J Diabetes Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Background: This 4-week, phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, outpatient study demonstrated the safe and effective use of the dulaglutide single-dose pen containing 0.5 mL of placebo for subcutaneous injection in injection-naïve adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with A1C ≤ 8.5% (69 mmol/mol), BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2 and ≤ 45 kg/m(2).

Method: Patients completed a modified self-injecting subscale of the Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire (mD-FISQ) and were trained to self-inject with the single-dose pen. Patients completed the initial self-injection at the site, injected at home for 2 subsequent weeks, and returned to the site for the final injection. The initial and final self-injections were evaluated for success; the final (initial) self-injection success rate was the primary (secondary) outcome measure, and the primary (secondary) objective was to demonstrate this success rate as being significantly greater than 80%. Patients recorded their level of pain after each injection. After the final injection, patients completed the mD-FISQ and the Medication Delivery Device Assessment Battery (MDDAB) to assess their perceptions of the single-dose pen, including ease of use and experience with the device.

Results: Among 211 patients (mean age: 61 years), the primary objective was met, with a final injection success rate of 99.1% (95% CI: 96.6% to 99.7%). Among 214 patients, the initial injection success rate was 97.2% (95% CI: 94.0% to 98.7%), meeting the key secondary objective. Overall, most patients (>96%) found the device easy to use, were satisfied with the device, and would be willing to continue to use the single-dose pen after the study. There was a significant reduction (P < .001) from baseline to study end in patients' fear of self-injecting, as measured by the mD-FISQ.

Conclusions: The dulaglutide single-dose pen was found to be a safe and effective device for use by patients with T2D who were injection-naïve. A positive injection experience is an important factor for patients and providers when initiating injectable therapy.

Keywords: dulaglutide; self-injection; single-dose pen; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Kate Van Brunt, Alan G. Zimmermann, Rebecca Threlkeld, and Debra A. Ignaut are employees and/or stockholders of Eli Lilly and Company.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The single-dose pen.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean pain scores at each injection.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Ease of Use module results. SDP, single-dose pen.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Device Features module results.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Change in patients’ fear of self-injecting scores between baseline and week 3. mD-FISQ, modified Diabetes Fear of Injecting and Self-Testing Questionnaire.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peyrot M, Matthews DR, Snoek FJ, et al. An international study of psychological resistance to insulin use among persons with diabetes. Diabetologia. 2003;46(suppl 2):A89.
    1. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2673-2679. - PubMed
    1. Korytkowski M. When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26(suppl 3):S18-S24. - PubMed
    1. An J, Nichol MB. Multiple medication adherence and its effect on clinical outcomes among patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Med Care. 2013;51:879-887. - PubMed
    1. Hornsten A, Lundman B, Selstam EK, Sandstrom H. Patient satisfaction with diabetes care. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51:609-617. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms