Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 May;25(2):145-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

Results of the national lung cancer screening trial: where are we now?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Results of the national lung cancer screening trial: where are we now?

Neel P Chudgar et al. Thorac Surg Clin. 2015 May.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 May;30(2):xi. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.02.002. Thorac Surg Clin. 2020. PMID: 32327182 No abstract available.

Abstract

The National Lung Screening Trial was a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial published in 2011. It found that annual screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) in a high-risk population was associated with a 20% reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality compared with conventional chest radiography. Several leading professional organizations have since put forth lung cancer screening guidelines that include the use of LDCT, largely on the basis of this study. Broad adoption of these screening recommendations, however, remains a challenge.

Keywords: Low-dose CT; Lung cancer; NLST; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest/disclosure statement:

All authors declare no conflicts of interest and have no disclosures to make.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagnoses, by Stage, for LDCT and CXR CXR, chest radiography; LDCT, low-dose computed tomography. Data from Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wender RC, Smith R, Harper D. Cancer screening. Primary care. 2002 Sep;29(3):697–725. - PubMed
    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9–29. - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA. Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012;157(2):120–134. - PubMed
    1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2014 Jul;64(4):252–271. - PubMed
    1. Weinberg DS, Schoen RE. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2014 May 6;160(9) - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms