Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;26(4):575-9.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000310.

Ambient PM2.5 and Risk of Hospital Admissions: Do Risks Differ for Men and Women?

Michelle L Bell  1 , Ji-Young Son, Roger D Peng, Yun Wang, Francesca Dominici
Affiliations

Ambient PM2.5 and Risk of Hospital Admissions: Do Risks Differ for Men and Women?

Michelle L Bell et al. Epidemiology. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background: While strong evidence exists for associations between fine particles (PM2.5) and health, less is known about whether associations differ by sex.

Methods: We used Bayesian hierarchical modeling to estimate associations between PM2.5, based on ambient monitors, and risk of cause-specific cardiovascular and respiratory hospitalizations for about 12.6 million Medicare beneficiaries (>65 years) residing in 213 US counties for 1999-2010.

Results: Point estimates were higher for women than men for almost all causes of hospitalization. PM2.5 risks were higher for women than men for respiratory tract infection, cardiovascular, and heart rhythm disturbance admissions. A 10 μg/m(3) increase in same-day PM2.5 was associated with a 1.13% increased risk of heart rhythm disturbance admissions for women (95% posterior interval [PI]: 0.63%, 1.63%), and 0.03% for men (95% PI: -0.48%, 0.55%). Differences remained after stratification by age and season.

Conclusions: Women may be more susceptible to PM2.5-related hospitalizations for some respiratory and cardiovascular causes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Fann N, et al. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Anal. 2012;32(1):81–95. - PubMed
    1. Anenberg SC, et al. An estimate of the global burden of anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter on premature human mortality using atmospheric modeling. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(9):1189–1195. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. EPA. The Green Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. 2014 Jun 1; 2014]; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/index.html.
    1. Bell ML, Zanobetti A, Dominici F. Evidence on vulnerability and susceptibility to health risks associated with short-term exposure to particulate matter: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):865–876. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colais P, et al. Particulate air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiac diseases in potentially sensitive subgroups. Epidemiology. 2012;23(3):473–481. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances