Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2015 Apr 23;2015(4):rjv048.
doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjv048.

Restoring esophageal continuity following a failed colonic interposition for long-gap esophageal atresia

Affiliations
Case Reports

Restoring esophageal continuity following a failed colonic interposition for long-gap esophageal atresia

Beatrice Dionigi et al. J Surg Case Rep. .

Abstract

The Foker process is a method of esophageal lengthening through axial tension-induced growth, allowing for subsequent primary reconstruction of the esophagus in esophageal atresia (EA). In this unique case, the Foker process was used to grow the remaining esophageal segment long enough to attain esophageal continuity following failed colonic interpositions for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). Initially developed for the treatment of LGEA in neonates, this case demonstrates that (i) an active esophageal lengthening response may still be present beyond the neonate time-period; and, (ii) the Foker process can be used to restore esophageal continuity following a failed colonic interposition if the lower esophageal segment is still present.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
(A) Lateral view during her initial fluoroscopic examination illustrating a small, distal (lower) esophageal remnant present in situ (Black arrows). Contrast was injected through her existing gastrostomy tube. (B) Anterior–posterior (AP) view during initial fluoroscopic examination illustrating an aperistaltic, native colonic interposition in situ with significant dilatation.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Fluoroscopic examination illustrating incremental ‘growth’ of the distal (lower) esophageal segment while the patient was undergoing external traction (Foker Stage 1). The contrast was injected through her existing gastrostomy tube. The metal dot refers to her esophagostomy; thus, can measure the distance between the ends of her esophageal segments.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
An intraoperative esophagram following a routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is pictured on the right, as compared with her postoperative esophagram on the left. The EGD was performed on this patient following her anastomosis (Foker Stage II); the native esophagus was now in continuity. Contrast was injected above the level of the anastomosis, which demonstrated neither leak nor stricture.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Her last follow-up EGD demonstrating a patent native esophagus.

References

    1. Foker J, Linden B, Boyle E, Marquardt C. Development of a true primary repair for the full spectrum of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 1997;4:533–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogel A, Yang E, Fishman S. Hydrostatic stretch-induced growth facilitating primary anastomosis in long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:1170–2. - PubMed
    1. Fürst H, Hartl WH, Löhe F, Schildberg FW. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: an alternative technique based on the use of the right colon. Ann Surg 2000;231:173–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domreis JS, Jobe BA, Aye RW, Deveney KE, Sheppard BC, Deveney CW. Management of long-term failure after colonic interposition for benign disease. Am J Surg 2002;183:544–6. - PubMed
    1. Gallo G, Zwaveling S, Groen H, Van der Zee D, Hulscher J. Long-gap esophageal atresia: a meta-analysis of jejunal interposition, colon interposition, and gastric pull-up. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012;22:420–5. - PubMed

Publication types