Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 24;2015(4):CD010663.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010663.pub2.

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Josette Bettany-Saltikov  1 , Hans-Rudolf Weiss, Nachiappan Chockalingam, Razvan Taranu, Shreya Srinivas, Julie Hogg, Victoria Whittaker, Raman V Kalyan, Tracey Arnell
Affiliations

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Josette Bettany-Saltikov et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine. While AIS can progress during growth and cause a surface deformity, it is usually not symptomatic. However, if the final spinal curvature surpasses a certain critical threshold, the risk of health problems and curve progression is increased. Interventions for the prevention of AIS progression include scoliosis-specific exercises, bracing, and surgery. The main aims of all types of interventions are to correct the deformity and prevent further deterioration of the curve and to restore trunk asymmetry and balance, while minimising morbidity and pain, allowing return to full function. Surgery is normally recommended for curvatures exceeding 40 to 50 degrees to stop curvature progression with a view to achieving better truncal balance and cosmesis. Short-term results of the surgical treatment of people with AIS demonstrate the ability of surgery to improve various outcome measures. However there is a clear paucity of information on long-term follow-up of surgical treatment of people with AIS.

Objectives: To examine the impact of surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with AIS who have severe curves of over 45 degrees, with a focus on trunk balance, progression of scoliosis, cosmetic issues, quality of life, disability, psychological issues, back pain, and adverse effects, at both the short term (a few months) and the long term (over 20 years).

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Back Review Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, four other databases, and three trials registers up to August 2014 with no language limitations. We also checked the reference lists of relevant articles and conducted an extensive handsearch of the grey literature.

Selection criteria: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective controlled trials comparing spinal fusion surgery with non-surgical interventions in people with AIS with a Cobb angle greater than 45 degrees. We were interested in all types of instrumented surgical interventions with fusion that aimed to provide curve correction and spine stabilisation.

Data collection and analysis: We found no RCTs or prospective controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria.

Main results: We did not identify any evidence comparing surgical to non-surgical interventions for AIS with severe curves of over 45 degrees.

Authors' conclusions: We cannot draw any conclusions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010663

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Anderson 2006 {published data only}
    1. Anderson MO, Christenesen SB, Thomsen K. Outcome at 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31(3):350‐4. - PubMed
Bunge 2007 {published data only}
    1. Bunge EM, Juttmann RE, Kleuver M, Biezen FC, Koning HJ. Health‐related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: short‐term effects after brace or surgical treatment. European Spine Journal 2007;16(1):83‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Danielsson 2001 {published data only}
    1. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26(5):516‐25. - PubMed
Danielsson 2001a {published data only}
    1. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26(13):1449‐56. - PubMed
Danielsson 2001b {published data only}
    1. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL. Health‐related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow‐up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. European Spine Journal 2001;10(4):278‐88. - PMC - PubMed
Danielsson 2003 {published data only}
    1. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Back pain and function 22 years after brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case‐control study ‐ part 1. Spine 2003;28(18):2078‐86. - PubMed
Danielsson 2006 {published data only}
    1. Danielsson AJ, Romberg K, Nachemson AL. Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31(3):275‐83. - PubMed
Pehrsson 2001 {published data only}
    1. Pehrsson K, Danielson A, Nachemson A. Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 25 year follow up after surgery or start of brace treatment. Thorax 2001;56(5):388‐93. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Asher 2003
    1. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society－22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28(1):63‐9. - PubMed
Asher 2006
    1. Asher M, Burton D. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 2006;1(1):2. [DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Bago 2010
    1. Bago J, Sanchez‐Raya J, Sanchez Perez‐Grueso F, Climent J. The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2010;5(1):6. - PMC - PubMed
Berryman 2008
    1. Berryman F, Pynsent P, Fairbank J, Disney S. A new system for measuring three‐dimensional back shape in scoliosis. European Spine Journal 2008;17(5):663–72. - PMC - PubMed
Bettany‐Saltikov 2012
    1. Bettany‐Saltikov. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Step by Step Guide for Nursing Practice. 1st Edition. London: Open University Press, 2012.
Bradford 1987
    1. Bradford D, Lonstein J, Moe J, Ogilvie J, Winter R. Moe's Textbook of Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities. 2. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1987.
Bridwell 1999
    1. Bridwell K. Surgical treatment of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Spine (Focus Issue) 1999;24(24):2607‐16. - PubMed
Castro 2003
    1. Castro F Jr. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing and the Hueter‐Volkmann principle. Spine 2003;3(3):180‐5. - PubMed
Climent 1999
    1. Climent J, Sanchez J. Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of adolescents with spine deformities. Spine 1999;24(18):1903‐8. - PubMed
Coillard 2002
    1. Coillard C, Leroux M, Badeaux J, Rivard C. SPINECOR: a new therapeutic approach for idiopathic scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002;88(1):215‐7. - PubMed
Coillard 2003
    1. Coillard C, Leroux M, Zabjek K, Rivard C. SpineCor－A non‐rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: post‐treatment results. European Spine Journal 2003;12(2):141‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Dolan 2007
    1. Dolan L, Weinstein S. Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence‐based review. Spine 2007;32(19):S91‐100. - PubMed
Downs 1998
    1. Downs S, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non‐randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 1998;52(6):377‐84. - PMC - PubMed
Fallstrom 1986
    1. Fallstrom K, Cochran T, Nachemson A. Long‐term effects on personality development in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: influence of type of treatment. Spine 1986;11(7):756‐8. - PubMed
Freidel 2002
    1. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, Steiner A, Warschburger P, Weiss Hans R. Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27(4):E87‐91. - PubMed
Furlan 2009
    1. Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Tulder M, Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 2009;34(18):1929‐41. - PubMed
Goldberg 2002
    1. Goldberg C, Moore D, Fogerty E, Dowling F. The natural history of early onset scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002;91(SUPP 3):68‐70. - PubMed
Grivas 2008
    1. Grivas T, Vasiliadis E, Olga D, Triantafyllopoulos S, Triantafyllopoulos G. What a school screening program could contribute in clinical research of idiopathic scoliosis aetiology. Disability and Rehabilitation 2008;30(10):752‐62. - PubMed
Haher 2003
    1. Haher T, Merola A. Atlas of Spine Surgical Techniques. 1. Vol. 1, New York, NY: Thieme, 2003.
Hawes 2006a
    1. Hawes M. Impact of spine surgery on signs and symptoms of spinal deformity. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2006;9(4):318‐39. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Kadoury 2009
    1. Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Beausejour M, Stokes I, Parent S, Labelle H. A three‐dimensional retrospective analysis of the evolution of spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal 2009;18(1):23‐37. - PMC - PubMed
Kanayama 1996
    1. Kanayama M, Tadano S, Kaneda K, Ukai T, Abumi K. A. mathematical expression of three dimensional configuration of the scoliotic spine. ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1996;2(118):247‐52. - PubMed
Katz 2001
    1. Katz D, Durrani A. Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26(21):2354‐61. - PubMed
Knott 2010
    1. Knott P, Mardjetko S, Rollet M, Baute S, Riemenschneider M, Muncie L, et al. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the formetric 4D measurements for scoliosis. Scoliosis 2010;5(Suppl 1):O10.
Lenssinck 2005
    1. Lenssinck ML, Frijlink AC, Berger MY, Bierman‐Zeinstra SM, Verkerk K, Verhagen AP, et al. Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials. Physical Therapy 2005;85(12):1329–39. - PubMed
Lonner 2007
    1. Lonner BS, Kondrachov D, Siddigi F, Hayes V, Scharf C. Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Surgical technique.. American Journal of Bone Joint Surgery 2007;Suppl 2(1):142‐56. - PubMed
Lonstein 2006
    1. Lonstein JE. Scoliosis: surgical versus non‐surgical treatment. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2006;443(1):248–59. - PubMed
Lupparelli 2002
    1. Lupparelli S, Pola E, Pitta L, Mazza O, Santis V, Aulisa L, et al. Biomechanical factors affecting progression of structural scoliotic curves of the spine. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002;91(1):81‐5. - PubMed
Lykissas 2013
    1. Lykissas M, Jain V, Nathan S, Pawar V, Eismann E, Sturm P, et al. Mid‐ to long‐term outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a meta‐analysis. Spine 2013;38(2):E113‐9. - PubMed
Maruyama 2008
    1. Maruyama T, Takeshita K. Surgical treatment of scoliosis: a review of techniques currently applied. Scoliosis 2008;3(6):1‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Merola 2002
    1. Merola A, Haher TR, Brkaric M, Panagopoulos G, Mathur S, Kohani O, Lowe TG. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27(18):2046‐51. - PubMed
Negrini 2005
    1. Negrini S, Aulisa L, Ferraro C, Fraschini P, Masiero S, Simonazzi P, et al. Italian guidelines on rehabilitation treatment of adolescents with scoliosis or other spinal deformities. Europa Medicophysica 2005;41(2):183‐201. - PubMed
Negrini 2006c
    1. Negrini S, Marchini G. Efficacy of the symmetric, patient‐oriented, rigid, three‐dimensional, active (SPoRT) concept of bracing for scoliosis: a prospective study of the Sforzesco versus Lyon brace. Europa Medicophysica 2006;43(2):171‐81. - PubMed
Negrini 2010
    1. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Romano M, Bettany‐Saltikov JA, Chokalingham N, Grivas T, et al. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006850.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Negrini 2012
    1. Negrini S, Aulisa A, Aulisa L, Circo A, Mauroy J, Durmala J, et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 2012;7(1):3. - PMC - PubMed
Noonan 1997
    1. Noonan K, Dolan L, Jacobson W, Weinstein S. Long‐term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 1997;17(6):712‐7. - PubMed
Odermatt 2003
    1. Odermatt D, Mathieu P, Beausejour M, Labelle H, Aubin C. Electromyography of scoliotic patients treated with a brace. Journal of Orthopaedic Resources 2003;21(5):931‐6. - PubMed
Olgun 2013
    1. Olgun ZD, Yazic M. Posterior instrumentation and fusion. Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 2013;7(1):69‐76. - PMC - PubMed
Oxborrow 2000
    1. Oxborrow N. Methodology. Current topic: assessing the child with scoliosis: the role of surface topography. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2000;83(5):453‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Pineda 2006
    1. Pineda S, Bago J, Gilperez C, Climent J. Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjective perception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2006;1(1):18. - PMC - PubMed
Reichel 2003
    1. Reichel D, Schanz J. Developmental psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2003;6(34):221‐5. - PubMed
Review Manager (RevMan) 2014
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) (Computer program). 2014.
Rigo 2006a
    1. Rigo M, Negrini S, Weiss H, Grivas T, Maruyama T, Kotwicki T, et al. SOSORT consensus paper on brace action: TLSO biomechanics of correction (investigating the rationale for force vector selection). Scoliosis 2006;1(1):11. - PMC - PubMed
Roaf 1980
    1. Roaf R. Spinal Deformities. 2nd Edition. Tunbridge Wells: Pitman Medical, 1980.
Romano 2012
    1. Romano M, Minozzi S, Bettany‐Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Kotwicki T, et al. Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007837.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Rowe 1997
    1. Rowe D, Bernstein S, Riddick M, Adler F, Emans J, Gardner‐Bonneau D, et al. A meta‐analysis of the efficacy of non‐operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 1997;79(5):664‐74. - PubMed
Sanders 2007
    1. Sanders J, Harrast J, Kuklo T, Polly D, Bridwell K, Diab M, et al. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32(24):2719‐22. - PubMed
Shekelle 1994
    1. Shekelle P, Andersson G, Bombardier C, Cherkin D, Deyo R, Keller R, et al. A brief introduction to the critical reading of the clinical literature. Spine 1994;19(19):2028S‐31S. - PubMed
Smania 2008
    1. Smania N, Picelli A, Romano M, Negrini S. Neurophysiological basis of rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Disability and Rehabilitation 2008;30(10):763‐71. - PubMed
Stokes 1996
    1. Stokes I, Spence H, Aronsson D, Kilmer N. Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth: implications for scoliosis progression. Spine 1996;21(10):1162‐7. - PubMed
Stokes 2006
    1. Stokes I, Burwell R, Dangerfield P. Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis－a test of the ’vicious cycle’ pathogenetic hypothesis: summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Scoliosis 2006;1(1):16. - PMC - PubMed
Sutton 2000
    1. Sutton A, Duval S, Tweedie R, Abrams K, Jones D. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta­analyses. BMJ 2000;320(1):1574‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Van Tulder 2003
    1. Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Editorial Board Cochrane Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systemic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003;28(12):1290‐9. - PubMed
Vasiliadis 2006
    1. Vasiliadis E, Grivas T, Gkoltsiou K. Development and preliminary validation of Brace Questionnaire (BrQ): a new instrument for measuring quality of life of brace treated scoliotics. Scoliosis 2006;1(7):1‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Weiss 2004
    1. Weiss H, Hawes M. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing and the Hueter‐Volkmann principle. Spine Journal 2004;4(4):485‐6. - PubMed
Weiss 2006a
    1. Weiss H, Negrini S, Hawes M, Rigo M, Kotwicki T, Grivas T, et al. Physical exercises in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis at risk of brace treatment‐SOSORT Consensus Paper 2005. Scoliosis 2006;1(1):6. - PMC - PubMed
Weiss 2006b
    1. Weiss H, Reichel D, Schanz J, Zimmermann‐Gudd S. Deformity related stress in adolescents with AIS. Studies of Health and Technology Informatics 2006;123(1):347–51. - PubMed
Weiss 2008a
    1. Weiss H, Goodall D. Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review of the PubMed literature. Scoliosis 2008;3(9):1‐18. [DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-3-9] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Weiss 2008b
    1. Weiss H. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)－an indication for surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Disability and Rehabilitation 2008;30(10):799‐807. - PubMed
Weiss 2008c
    1. Weiss H, Goodall D. The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review. European Journal of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine 2008;44(2):177‐93. - PubMed
Weiss 2013
    1. Weiss H, Moramarco M, Moramarco K. Risks and long‐term complications of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery vs. non‐surgical and natural history outcomes. Hard Tissue 2013;2(3):27.
Westrick 2011
    1. Westrick E, Ward W. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5‐year to 20‐year evidence‐based surgical results. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 2011;31(1 suppl):S61‐8. - PubMed
White 1990
    1. White A, Panjabi M. Chapter 7. Functional analysis and clinical applications. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd Edition. Baltimore: Lippincott, 1990.

Publication types