Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jun;65(3):156-63.
doi: 10.1111/idj.12166. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

A 4-year assessment of a new water-fluoridation scheme in New South Wales, Australia

Anthony S Blinkhorn  1 , Roy Byun  1   2 , Pathik Mehta  1 , Meredith Kay  3
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A 4-year assessment of a new water-fluoridation scheme in New South Wales, Australia

Anthony S Blinkhorn et al. Int Dent J. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To monitor the changes in dental caries prevalence of 5- to 7-year-old children living in a fluoridated area, a newly fluoridated area and in an area without water fluoridation, in NSW, Australia.

Methods: Dental caries prevalence was recorded for 5- to 7-year-old children, living in the three study locations, by six trained and calibrated examiners in 2008, 2010 and 2012. A questionnaire recorded demographic data, toothbrushing behaviour and sugary drink consumption. Caries experience was measured using the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (dmft) index for primary teeth, the percentage of children who were caries free and the significant caries index. Univariate analysis was undertaken to determine independent predictors of caries.

Results: The caries prevalence changed over time. In 2008, the mean dmft index was 1.40 for the fluoridated area, 2.02 for the area about to fluoridate and 2.09 for the unfluoridated control. By 2012, these mean dmft scores were 0.69, 0.72 and 1.21, respectively. In the two areas where children received fluoridated water, the significant caries index was 2.30 for the fluoridated area and 2.40 for the newly fluoridated area. The significant caries score for children in the unfluoridated location was 3.93. Multivariate analysis showed that over time the differences in dental caries prevalence between the established fluoride area and the newly fluoridated area diminished. However, children in the unfluoridated control area continued to demonstrate significant differences in the mean number of decayed teeth compared with children in the fluoridated comparator sites, and the proportions of children free from decay were significantly higher in the fluoridated areas than in the unfluoridated area.

Conclusion: Fluoridation of public water supplies in Gosford and Wyong offers young children better dental health than those children who do not have access to this public health measure.

Keywords: Australia; Water fluoridation; dental caries; primary school children; trends over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NSW Department of Health. PD2006_076 Policy Directive; Fluorides-use of in NSW. In: Strategy CFOH, editor. Sydney NSW Health; 2006
    1. McDonagh MS, Whiting PF, Wilson PM, et al. Systematic review of water fluoridation. Br Med J. 2000;321:855–859. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blinkhorn A, Byun R, Johnson G, et al. The Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neil A. The extent of water fluoridation coverage in Australia. ANZ J Public Health. 2011;35:392–393. - PubMed
    1. Phelan C, Byun R, Skinner J, et al. Child Dental Health Survey 2007: a snapshot of the oral health status of primary school-aged children in NSW. N S W Public Health Bull. 2009;20:40–45. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances