Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 25914488
- PMCID: PMC4402326
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4757
Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Aim: To compare the outcomes of hand-sewn (HS) and linearly stapled (LS) esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.
Methods: Before beginning this study, a rigorous protocol was established according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. Databases and references were searched for all randomized controlled trials and comparative clinical studies that compared LS with HS esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer. The primary outcomes compared were anastomotic leak and stricture. Subgroup analyses were performed according to site of anastomosis.
Results: Fifteen studies were used, comprising 3203 patients (n = 2027 LS and 1176 HS). Primary outcome analysis revealed a significant decrease in anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.41-0.65; P < 0.00001) associated with LS anastomosis. A significantly reduced rate of anastomotic stricture associated with LS was also found (RR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.49-0.64; P < 0.00001). A subgroup analysis according to the site of anastomosis revealed a significantly reduced rate of anastomotic stricture (P < 0.00001). Although there was no significant difference in the decrease in thoracic anastomotic leakage, there was a significant decrease in cervical anastomotic leakage associated with LS (P < 0.00001).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that the LS technique contributes to a reduced rate of leakage and stricture compared with the HS method.
Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Anastomotic stricture; Hand-sewn anastomosis; Linearly stapled anastomosis; Meta-analysis.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jun;49(6):1650-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv395. Epub 2015 Nov 15. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26574497
-
Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 31;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01393-x. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32736599 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.045. Epub 2013 Feb 8. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23395626
-
Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):17218-26. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17218. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25493038 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec;407(8):3297-3309. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02706-2. Epub 2022 Oct 15. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022. PMID: 36242619
Cited by
-
Dysphagia After Esophageal Replacement and Its Treatment.Dysphagia. 2023 Oct;38(5):1323-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10557-2. Epub 2023 Jan 31. Dysphagia. 2023. PMID: 36719515 Free PMC article.
-
A safe and simple technique for nasogastric tube insertion in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer surgery.World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov 3;19(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02428-7. World J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34732220 Free PMC article.
-
Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):422-432. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05482-y. Epub 2022 Nov 22. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 36417036 Review.
-
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Esophago-jejunal Anastomosis During Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in 72 Patients: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study in Poland.Med Sci Monit. 2023 Jan 26;29:e938759. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938759. Med Sci Monit. 2023. PMID: 36698295 Free PMC article.
-
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Totally Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 May 26;12:849250. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.849250. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35692741 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
-
- Albiñana V, Recio-Poveda L, Zarrabeitia R, Bernabéu C, Botella LM. Propranolol as antiangiogenic candidate for the therapy of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Thromb Haemost. 2012;108:41–53. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
-
- Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1991;78:342–345. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical