Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 May;65(634):e305-11.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684829.

Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice

Matthew J Ridd et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May.

Abstract

Background: Continuity of care may affect the diagnostic process in cancer but there is little research.

Aim: To estimate associations between patient-doctor continuity and time to diagnosis and referral of three common cancers.

Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study in general practices in England.

Method: This study used data from the General Practice Research Database for patients aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Relevant cancer symptoms or signs were identified up to 12 months before diagnosis. Patient-doctor continuity (fraction-of-care index adjusted for number of consultations) was calculated up to 24 months before diagnosis. Time ratios (TRs) were estimated using accelerated failure time regression models.

Results: Patient-doctor continuity in the 24 months before diagnosis was associated with a slightly later diagnosis of colorectal (time ratio [TR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.01 to 1.02) but not breast (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.01) or lung cancer (TR = 1.00, 0.99 to 1.00). Secondary analyses suggested that for colorectal and lung cancer, continuity of doctor before the index consultation was associated with a later diagnosis but continuity after the index consultation was associated with an earlier diagnosis, with no such effects for breast cancer. For all three cancers, most of the delay to diagnosis occurred after referral.

Conclusion: Any effect for patient-doctor continuity appears to be small. Future studies should compare investigations, referrals, and diagnoses in patients with and without cancer who present with possible cancer symptoms or signs; and focus on 'difficult to diagnose' types of cancer.

Keywords: cancer; continuity of care; diagnosis; general practice; patient-doctor continuity; symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, et al. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327:1219–1221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell SM, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D, et al. Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8:499–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:445–451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saultz JW, Lochner J. Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:159–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ridd M, Shaw A, Salisbury C. ‘Two sides of the coin’ — the value of personal continuity to GPs: a qualitative interview study. Fam Pract. 2006;23:461–468. - PubMed

Publication types