Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May;135(5):1489-1498.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001193.

The foreign body response: at the interface of surgery and bioengineering

Affiliations
Review

The foreign body response: at the interface of surgery and bioengineering

Melanie R Major et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 May.

Abstract

Background: The surgical implantation of materials and devices has dramatically increased over the past decade. This trend is expected to continue with the broadening application of biomaterials and rapid expansion of aging populations. One major factor that limits the potential of implantable materials and devices is the foreign body response, an immunologic reaction characterized by chronic inflammation, foreign body giant cell formation, and fibrotic capsule formation.

Methods: The English literature on the foreign body response to implanted materials and devices is reviewed.

Results: Fibrotic encapsulation can cause device malfunction and dramatically limit the function of an implanted medical device or material. Basic science studies suggest a role for immune and inflammatory pathways at the implant-host interface that drive the foreign body response. Current strategies that aim to modulate the host response and improve construct biocompatibility appear promising.

Conclusions: This review article summarizes recent basic science, preclinical, and clinicopathologic studies examining the mechanisms driving the foreign body response, with particular focus on breast implants and synthetic meshes. Understanding these molecular and cellular mechanisms will be critical for achieving the full potential of implanted biomaterials to restore human tissues and organs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arujuna A, Williams S, Whittaker J, et al. Trends, indications and outcomes of cardiac implantable device system extraction: A single UK centre experience over the last decade. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:218–225
    1. Rennert RC, Rustad K, Levi K, et al. A histological and mechanical analysis of the cardiac lead-tissue interface: Implications for lead extraction. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2200–2208
    1. Kvist PH, Iburg T, Bielecki M, et al. Biocompatibility of electrochemical glucose sensors implanted in the subcutis of pigs. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006;8:463–475
    1. Ma J, Chen T, Mandelin J, et al. Regulation of macrophage activation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003;60:2334–2346
    1. Spiller KL, Anfang RR, Spiller KJ, et al. The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4477–4488

MeSH terms

Substances