Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Appearance and Quality of Life following Rhinoplasty Using the FACE-Q Appraisal Scales
- PMID: 25919265
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001159
Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Appearance and Quality of Life following Rhinoplasty Using the FACE-Q Appraisal Scales
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction with appearance and improved quality of life are primary outcomes in cosmetic surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in patient satisfaction with facial and nose appearance, and quality of life following rhinoplasty.
Methods: Patients presenting for rhinoplasty completed the FACE-Q, a new patient-reported outcome instrument composed of scales that measure outcomes in patients undergoing facial cosmetic procedures. The following FACE-Q scales were used: satisfaction with facial appearance overall, satisfaction with nose, psychological well-being, and social function.
Results: Fifty-six patients completed the FACE-Q at the time of their preoperative consultation and/or at postoperative follow-up visits. Among all patients presenting for rhinoplasty, FACE-Q scores (range, 0 to 100) increased following the procedure in satisfaction with facial appearance (+26.5; p < 0.01), psychological well-being (+15.7; p < 0.01), and social function (+13.7; p = 0.03). Satisfaction with nose item scores (range, 1 to 4) all increased significantly from before to after rhinoplasty, including in satisfaction with nose appearance in the mirror (+1.4; p < 0.01), size (+1.1; p < 0.01), shape (+1.5; p < 0.01), profile (+1.6; p < 0.01), and in photographs (+1.6; p < 0.01). Similar results were seen among a subgroup of patients who completed the FACE-Q scales both before and after rhinoplasty.
Conclusions: In an objective study using a validated patient-reported outcome instrument, improvements in satisfaction with facial and nose appearance and quality of life were demonstrated among rhinoplasty patients. This model supports the successful outcomes possible in rhinoplasty.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
Similar articles
-
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):27-35. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1445. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 26605889 Free PMC article.
-
Post-rhinoplasty outcomes in an Indian population assessed using the FACE-Q appraisal scales: a prospective observational study.J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Mar;134(3):247-251. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120000638. J Laryngol Otol. 2020. PMID: 32172693
-
Assessing Demographic Differences in Patient-Perceived Improvement in Facial Appearance and Quality of Life Following Rhinoplasty.Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Sep;35(7):784-93. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv066. Epub 2015 Jun 10. Aesthet Surg J. 2015. PMID: 26063837 Free PMC article.
-
Functional/Aesthetic Measures of Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Review.Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Sep 13;39(10):1057-1062. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz029. Aesthet Surg J. 2019. PMID: 30722008 Review.
-
Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Jan 29;40(2):135-146. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz138. Aesthet Surg J. 2020. PMID: 31051500
Cited by
-
Multimodal Facial Aesthetic Treatment on the Appearance of Aging, Social Confidence, and Psychological Well-being: HARMONY Study.Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Jan 12;42(2):NP115-NP124. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab114. Aesthet Surg J. 2022. PMID: 33751048 Free PMC article.
-
Corneal re-innervation following refractive surgery treatments.Neural Regen Res. 2019 Apr;14(4):557-565. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.247421. Neural Regen Res. 2019. PMID: 30632489 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;46(6):2769-2780. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02974-9. Epub 2022 Jun 28. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35764813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of Rhinoplasty Outcomes with FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module: Norwegian Linguistic Validation and Clinical Application in 243 Patients.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2448. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002448. eCollection 2019 Sep. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019. PMID: 31942405 Free PMC article.
-
Invited Discussion on: Quality of Life and Concurrent Procedures in Truncal Body Contouring Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;45(4):1628-1632. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02192-9. Epub 2021 Mar 10. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33693982 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kosowski TR, McCarthy C, Reavey PL, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1819–1827
-
- Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM Jr. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: A pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:198–201
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials