Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Mar;20(2):98-100.
doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90151-4.

Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device

Affiliations

Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device

C C Mainds et al. Injury. 1989 Mar.

Abstract

A review of 385 proximal fractures of the femur treated with a telescopic screw system revealed that in nine cases the device had cut out of the head of the femur necessitating its removal. In two cases the head of the femur had been penetrated at the time of insertion. In all but one of the remaining seven cases the screw had been inserted in the superior half of the head and neck of the femur. The overall cut-out rate was 2.25 per cent but was 11.9 per cent when the screw was placed in the superior half of the head. When the screw was placed in the inferior half of the head, the cut-out rate was only 0.29 per cent. There was no correlation between this mechanical failure and age, sex, type of fracture or the presence of metabolic bone disease. These results indicate that if this otherwise effective form of internal fixation is to be used in the treatment of proximal fractures of the femur, care must be taken to avoid placement of the device in the superior half of the head and neck of the femur.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources