Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1989 Oct;12(5):339-45.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1989.tb01322.x.

Computer-assisted image analysis of sperm concentration in human semen before and after swim-up separation: comparison with assessment by haemocytometer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Computer-assisted image analysis of sperm concentration in human semen before and after swim-up separation: comparison with assessment by haemocytometer

S Y Chan et al. Int J Androl. 1989 Oct.

Abstract

Evaluation of male fertility is based predominantly on results from semen analysis and determination of the sperm concentration is one of the main parameters of the analysis. The availability of a fully automated videomicrographic digital image analyser would offer both an objective and rapid method for determination of the sperm concentration. In the present study the sperm concentration in 327 semen samples was determined by haemocytometer according to the World Health Organization guidelines, and also by a computer-assisted digital image analyser system. Results were classified according to the routine procedure (haemocytometer) before statistical analyses. The computerized measurements caused a shift to the right in the frequency distribution of sperm concentration. Sperm concentrations were more often overestimated significantly (P less than 0.001) by the computerized measurements in semen samples with concentrations up to 80.0 x 10(6)/ml. This overestimation seemed to be caused by the presence of particles in seminal plasma that were recognized incorrectly as sperm by the computer program. The computerized digital image analyser gave an average sperm concentration of 2.2 +/- 0.6 x 10(6)/ml (mean +/- SEM) in 17 azoospermic semen samples while the routine procedure did not detect the presence of sperm cells. After removing the seminal plasma by washing and centrifugation with culture medium, and using the swim-up procedure to harvest motile sperm, the computerized measurements showed comparable results with the routine procedure for those sperm preparations (n = 44) with sperm concentrations greater than 5.0 x 10(6)/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources