Similar articles

• The principle of determining relative enzyme activities by comparative kinetic microphotometry in situ.

  Pette D, Reichmann H. Pette D, et al. Histochem J. 1989 Sep-Oct;21(9-10):531-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01753353. Histochem J. 1989. PMID: 2687212 Review. No abstract available.
• A cytophotometric and electron-microscopical study on catalase activity in serial cryostat sections of rat liver.

  Frederiks WM, Ankum M, Bosch KS, Vreeling-Sindelárová H, Schellens JP, Van Noorden CJ. Frederiks WM, et al. Histochem J. 1995 Sep;27(9):681-8. Histochem J. 1995. PMID: 8557531
• Cytophotometric DNA-analysis of bone-tumors. A new method for preparing formalin-fixed tissue and the regarding of DNA-malignancy grade and its prognostic value.

  Adler CP, Neuburger M, Herget GW, Klemm CE, Saur S. Adler CP, et al. Pathol Res Pract. 1996 May;192(5):437-45. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(96)80005-7. Pathol Res Pract. 1996. PMID: 8832748
• A new combined quantitative cytophotometric method for estimating sulphydryl groups or disulphide bonds, and total protein in liver sections; applied to rats chronically exposed to cadmium.

  Morselt AF, Peereboom-Stegeman JH, Jongstra-Spaapen EJ. Morselt AF, et al. Acta Histochem Suppl. 1986;32:221-3. Acta Histochem Suppl. 1986. PMID: 2422688
• Cytophotometry.

  Auer G, Askensten U, Ahrens O. Auer G, et al. Hum Pathol. 1989 Jun;20(6):518-27. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90243-8. Hum Pathol. 1989. PMID: 2470665 Review.