Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 7;521(7550):99-104.
doi: 10.1038/nature14424. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

Allogeneic IgG combined with dendritic cell stimuli induce antitumour T-cell immunity

Affiliations

Allogeneic IgG combined with dendritic cell stimuli induce antitumour T-cell immunity

Yaron Carmi et al. Nature. .

Abstract

Whereas cancers grow within host tissues and evade host immunity through immune-editing and immunosuppression, tumours are rarely transmissible between individuals. Much like transplanted allogeneic organs, allogeneic tumours are reliably rejected by host T cells, even when the tumour and host share the same major histocompatibility complex alleles, the most potent determinants of transplant rejection. How such tumour-eradicating immunity is initiated remains unknown, although elucidating this process could provide the basis for inducing similar responses against naturally arising tumours. Here we find that allogeneic tumour rejection is initiated in mice by naturally occurring tumour-binding IgG antibodies, which enable dendritic cells (DCs) to internalize tumour antigens and subsequently activate tumour-reactive T cells. We exploited this mechanism to treat autologous and autochthonous tumours successfully. Either systemic administration of DCs loaded with allogeneic-IgG-coated tumour cells or intratumoral injection of allogeneic IgG in combination with DC stimuli induced potent T-cell-mediated antitumour immune responses, resulting in tumour eradication in mouse models of melanoma, pancreas, lung and breast cancer. Moreover, this strategy led to eradication of distant tumours and metastases, as well as the injected primary tumours. To assess the clinical relevance of these findings, we studied antibodies and cells from patients with lung cancer. T cells from these patients responded vigorously to autologous tumour antigens after culture with allogeneic-IgG-loaded DCs, recapitulating our findings in mice. These results reveal that tumour-binding allogeneic IgG can induce powerful antitumour immunity that can be exploited for cancer immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Extended Data 1
Extended Data 1
a. LMP (left) and B16 (right) growth in 129S1 (formula image) C57Bl/6 (formula image), or allogeneic hosts pretreated with anti-asialo-GM1 (formula image) or anti-NK1.1 antibodies (formula image) (n=6). Shown are representative plots of NK cells in the blood prior to tumor challenge. b. BrdU incorporation by CD4+ T cells (top graphs) and CD8+ T cells (bottom graphs) in lymphoid organs of 129S1 (formula image) and C57Bl/6 (formula image) LMP-bearing mice (n=8). c. Representative flow cytometric analysis of CD11bhi/Ly6Chi myeloid cells and mature DC (mDC) on day 10 after C57Bl/6 mice were inoculated with B16 tumor cells. d. Flow cytometric analysis of Ly6Cneg/CD11c+/MHCII+ cells from LMP-bearing mice (left panel) and B16-bearing mice (right panel). Histograms show representative expression levels of co-stimulatory molecules on DC from C57Bl/6 (formula image) and 129S1 mice (formula image) (n=8). e. IL-12 (right) and TNFα (left) in the supernatants of syngeneic BMDC (formula image), syngeneic blood monocyte-derived (Mo)-DC (formula image), allogeneic BMDC (formula image) or Mo-DC (formula image) incubated with live, frozen-thawed (necrotic), or mitomycin C-treated (apoptotic) LMP cells or E. coli BioParticles overnight (n=8). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 2
Extended Data 2
a. Flow cytometric analysis of the binding of various concentrations of IgG from 129S1 (formula image), IgM from 129S1 (formula image), IgG from C57Bl/6 (formula image) and IgM from C57Bl/6 mice (formula image) to LMP and B16 cells. The lower panel shows a representative histogram of IgG (left) or IgM (right) binding after incubation of 1µg of C57Bl/6 (formula image) or 129S1 (formula image) antibodies with 1x105 LMP (upper) or B16 (lower) cells (n=8). b. The left panel shows a representative histogram of the MFI of IgG after incubation of 2µg of either control antibody (formula image) or IgG from the serum of naïve C57Bl/6 mice (formula image), B16-bearing C57Bl/6 mice on day 7 (formula image), B16-bearing C57Bl/6 mice on day 14 (formula image) or naïve 129S1 mice (formula image) with 1x105 B16 cells (n=6). Right graph shows MFI of the binding of 2µg of each IgG to 1x105 B16 cells. c. Serum levels of IgG (left) and IgM (right) in C57Bl/6 (formula image) and 129S1 mice (formula image) following i.p injection with anti-B220 and anti-CD19 antibodies (n=8). d. LMP tumor size in naïve 129S1 mice injected with allogeneic IgG (formula image), allogeneic IgM (formula image), syngeneic IgG (formula image) or syngeneic IgM (formula image) on days −1 and 0 relative to tumor injection (n=6). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 3
Extended Data 3
a. Mean levels of CD40 and CD86 expression (left) and IL-12 secretion (right) in BMDC from C57Bl/6 (formula image) and FcγR KO mice (formula image) activated with IgG-IC overnight (n=6). b. Proliferation of CD4+ T cells cultured with BMDC from C57Bl/6 (formula image) and FcγR KO mice (formula image) loaded with IgG-IC (n=4). c. Tumor recurrence in untreated mice (formula image), mice treated with WT BMDC loaded with IgG-IC (formula image), or mice treated with FcγR KO BMDC loaded with IgG-IC (formula image) (n=8). d. and e. Percentages of tumor-free mice following adoptive transfer of 5x106 splenic CD4+ T cells (left graph) or CD8+ T cells (right graph) from naïve mice (formula image), or from LMP (d)- or B16 (e)-resected mice treated with DC+IgGC57 IC (formula image), DC+IgMC57 IC (formula image), DC+IgG129 IC (formula image), or DC+IgM129 IC (formula image), and subsequently challenged with LMP (d) or B16 (e) (n=6). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 4
Extended Data 4
a. Sorting and culture schema of DC from BM and tumor. b. Mean levels of IL-12 (left graph) and TNFα (right graph) in the supernatants of DC cultured overnight in medium alone (open bars), with B16 lysates (formula image), or with alloIgG-IC (formula image) (n=6). c. Percentage of MHCII+/CD86+ cells (left panel) or CFSE levels (right panel) in tumor-associated DC following overnight activation with PBS (formula image) or CFSE-labeled alloIgG-IC (formula image) with or without stimulatory molecules (n=12). d. Representative flow cytometric analysis and confocal images from one out of three independent experiments of B16-derived DC cultured overnight with CFSE-labeled fixed B16 cells (n=8). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from three independent experiments Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 5
Extended Data 5
a. B16 tumor size in C57Bl/6 mice left untreated (formula image) or injected intratumorally with 129S1 alloIgG (formula image), LPS (formula image), TNFα+CD28 (formula image), LPS+alloIgG (formula image) or TNFα+CD28+alloIgG (formula image) (n=15). b. B16 tumor size in C57Bl/6 mice left untreated (formula image) or injected intratumorally with 129S1 alloIgG (formula image), TNFα (formula image), CD28 (formula image), or CD40L (formula image) (n=12). c. LL/2 tumor size in C57Bl/6 mice left untreated (formula image), or injected intratumorally with 129S1 alloIgG (formula image), TNFα+CD40L (formula image), TNFα+CD28 (formula image), TNFα+CD40L+129S1 alloIgG (formula image) or TNFα+CD28+129S1 IgG (formula image) (n=8). d. Representative flow cytometric analysis from one out of three independent experiments of IgG binding total myeloid cells in B16 tumor-bearing mice 3 hours after intratumoral injection of PBS or 5µg PE-labeled alloIgG. e. Total numbers of CD11c+ cells in the draining lymph nodes of B16 tumor-bearing mice 4 days after treatment (n=6). f. Gating and sorting strategy of immune cell populations infiltrating B16 tumors. g. B16 growth in mice vaccinated with 2x106 B cells, mast cells, macrophages or NK cells from B16 tumors untreated (formula image), or injected with alloIgG (formula image) or alloIgG+TNFα+αCD40 (formula image) (n=6). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 6
Extended Data 6
a. B16 frequency in mice untreated (formula image), or treated with BMDC loaded with intact B16 cells coated with alloIgG (formula image), or with intact B16 cells cross-linked to syngeneic IgG (formula image) (n=8). b. B16 tumor frequency in mice untreated (formula image) or treated with BMDC loaded with intact B16 cells coated with alloIgG (formula image) or with intact B16 coated with monoclonal IgG against MHC-I (formula image) (n=8). c. RMA tumor growth following inoculation with 2.5x105 tumor cells in naïve C57Bl/6 mice (formula image), or in C57Bl/6 mice in which B16 tumors had completely regressed following treatment with alloIgG+TNFα+αCD40 (formula image). Also shown is the lack of B16 tumor growth in C57Bl/6 mice that were re-challenged with 2x105 B16 tumor cells following the regression of this tumor after treatment with alloIgG+TNFα+αCD40 (formula image) (n=8). d. Left: Tumor frequency in mice untreated (formula image) or treated with DC loaded with IC formed with alloIgG and cytosolic tumor proteins (formula image), nuclear tumor proteins (formula image) or membrane tumor proteins (formula image). Right: Tumor frequency in mice untreated (formula image), treated with DC loaded with IC formed from alloIgG and membrane proteins (formula image), membrane proteins without O- and N-glycans (formula image), or heat-denatured membrane proteins (formula image) (n=5). e. B16 tumor growth in C57Bl/6 mice untreated (formula image), or injected with TNFα+αCD40 (formula image), TNFα+αCD40+alloIgG (formula image), or TNFα+αCD40 and alloIgG absorbed on normal cells of the IgG-donor background (formula image) or on normal cells of the tumor background (formula image) (n=6). f. Tumor recurrence rates following resection in mice left untreated (formula image), treated with 2x106 DC loaded with IgG-IC from conventionally-raised C57Bl/6 (formula image), or with 2x106 DC loaded with IgG-IC from gnotobiotic C57Bl/6 mice (formula image) (n=6). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 7
Extended Data 7
a. Representative flow cytometric analysis and quantitation of binding of anti-IgG secondary antibody alone (formula image), 1 µg anti-GP-NMB (formula image) or 2 µg GP-NMB (formula image) per 1x105 B16 cells, normal skin cells, or normal spleen cells (n=6). b. Percentage of MHCII+/CD86+ BMDC following overnight activation with untreated LMP or B16 tumor cells, or with tumor cells coated with anti-GP-NMB (2µg/1x105 tumor cells) (n=8). c. Western blot of recombinant GP-NMB (62.5 ng and 125 ng) performed with 10µg/mL of IgG from naïve 129S1 mice, naïve C57Bl/6 mice, or 1µg/mL αGP-NMB. d. B16 tumor size in mice untreated (formula image) or treated with TNFα+αCD40 (formula image), alloIgG (formula image), anti-GP-NMB IgG (formula image), TNFα+αCD40+alloIgG (formula image), or with TNFα+αCD40+αGP-NMB (formula image) (n=8). e. B16 tumor size in C57Bl/6 WT mice untreated (formula image) or treated with TNFα+αCD40 (formula image), TNFα+αCD40+alloIgG (formula image), or with TNFα+αCD40+anti-GP-NMB (formula image), or in FcγR KO mice treated with TNFα+αCD40+alloIgG (formula image), or with TNFα+αCD40+anti-GP-NMB (formula image) (n=8). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 8
Extended Data 8
a. Representative flow cytometry plots of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in B16 tumors 6 days following treatment. Left graph: Percentage of CD45+ cells infiltrating B16 tumors 15–17 days after s.c. inoculation or six days after treatment. Right graph: Percentage of CD4+ (formula image) and CD8+ cells (formula image) among tumor-infiltrating CD45+ cells (n=10). b. Percentages of CD44 and IFNγ co-expressing CD4+ (formula image) and CD8+ cells (formula image) among tumor-infiltrating CD45+ cells 6 days following treatment or 15 days following s.c. inoculation (n=10) c. Frequency of IFNγ-expressing T cells that recognize gp100 (formula image) and Trp2 (formula image) among day 6 post-treatment tumor-infiltrating CD8+ cells. Gate shown: CD8+ T cells (n=10). d. Percentage of tumor-free mice following adoptive transfer of T cells from day 6 post-treatment B16 tumor-bearing mice untreated (formula image), treated with TNFα+αCD40 (formula image), with TNFα+αCD40+alloIgG (formula image), or with TNFα+αCD40+αGP-NMB (formula image). (n=9). e. Upper left: B16 tumor growth in untreated C57Bl/6 mice injected with rat IgG (formula image), with rat anti-CD4 (formula image), or with rat-CD8 (formula image). Upper right: B16 tumor growth in C57Bl/6 mice treated with TNFα+αCD40 and injected with rat IgG (formula image), with rat anti-CD4 (formula image), or with rat-CD8 (formula image). Lower left: B16 growth in C57Bl/6 mice treated with TNFα+αCD40+alloIgG and injected with rat IgG (formula image), with rat anti-CD4 (formula image), or with rat-CD8 (formula image). Lower right: B16 growth in C57Bl/6 mice treated with TNFα+αCD40+αGP-NMB and injected with rat IgG (formula image), with rat anti-CD4 (formula image), or with rat-CD8 (formula image) (n=9). Shown are the mean values ±SEM from three independent experiments. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Extended Data 9
Extended Data 9
a. Representative H&E sections of lung metastases on day 30 from one out of three independent experiments performed (magnification: 10x). b. MFI of tumor cells from MSTO-resected patients coated with autologous IgG or IgG from healthy donors (n=6). c and d. Widefield microscopy (c) and flow cytometry plots (d) of TADC from a lung carcinoma patient incubated overnight with autologous CFSE-labeled tumor cells (green) coated with selfIgG or alloIgG derived from a pool of 10 donors (1µg/2x105 cells) and in the presence of 50 ng/mL TNFα and 1 µg/mL CD40L. Shown are the mean values ±SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Tumor-binding antibodies initiate rejection of allogeneic tumors
a. Experimental design: Injection of LMP and B16 cells s.c. into syngeneic and allogeneic hosts. b. Growth of LMP and B16 tumors in C57Bl/6, 129S1, CD4+ cell-depleted or CD8+ cell-depleted allogeneic mice (n=6). c. Percentages of LMP-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells among CD45+ cells (n=5). d. Percentages of LMP-infiltrating CD11bhi/Ly6Chi cells and mature DC among total cells (n=4). e. Myeloid cells in the draining lymph nodes of mice inoculated with CFSE-labeled LMP cells 3d earlier (n=5). f. Tumor uptake, MHCII and CD86 expression by BMDC and blood monocyte-derived (Mo)-DC incubated overnight with CFSE-labeled live, frozen/thawed (necrotic), or mitomycin C-treated (apoptotic) LMP cells or fluorescein-labeled E. coli BioParticles (n=4). g. IgG and IgM bound in vivo to CFSE-labeled LMP cells 48h after tumor inoculation (n=5). h. and i. Representative staining of tumor sections by IgM and IgG 24h following inoculation of CFSE-labeled LMP cells. j. Tumor size in 129S1, C57Bl/6 and B cell-depleted allogeneic hosts (n=5). k. B16 size in naive mice or mice injected with syngeneic or allogeneic antibodies (n=5). B16 size in naïve C57Bl/6 and FcγR KO mice injected with allogeneic antibodies (n=5). Experiments were independently repeated at least 3 times and analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2. AlloIgG-IC are internalized and presented by BMDC and drive protective immunity in vivo
a. Experimental design: Tumor cells or lysates were incubated with syngeneic or allogeneic antibodies and then cultured with BMDC overnight. b. Expression of CD86/MHCII on BMDC cultured with antibody-coated tumor lysates or intact tumor cells (n=5). c. TNFα and IL-12 in supernatants of BMDC cultured overnight with Ig-IC formed with LMP lysate or intact LMP cells (n=5). d. Internalization of CFSE in BMDC incubated overnight with Ig-IC formed from CFSE-labeled tumor lysates or CFSE-labeled intact cells (n=4). e. Representative localization of MHCII and Ig-IC on BMDC cultured overnight with CFSE-labeled LMP cells coated with allogeneic antibodies (magnification: 400x). f. Proliferation of CD4+ T cells cultured with DC loaded with IC formed from LMP and B16 lysates or intact cells (n=5). g. Experimental design: Tumors were removed from mice, coated with antibodies, incubated for 24h with BMDC, and injected s.c. into corresponding tumor-resected mice. h. Tumor recurrence in mice treated with BMDC loaded with tumor lysate incubated with allogeneic or syngeneic antibodies (n=5). Experiments were independently repeated at least 3 times and analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3. TADC, but not BMDC, require stimulation to respond to alloIgG-IC
a. Tumor growth following intratumoral injection of PBS, 129S1 IgG or C57Bl/6 IgG (n=6). b. CD86 and MHCII expression on DC incubated with PBS, tumor lysates or alloIgG-IC (n=5). c. TNFα and IL-12 in the supernatants of DC cultured with PBS control, LMP lysate or alloIgG-IC (n=5). d. Proliferation of CD4+ T cells cultured with DC treated with PBS, tumor lysate, or alloIgG-IC (n=5). e. Recurrence of resected LMP and B16 in untreated mice or mice treated with alloIgG-IC-activated BMDC or TADC (n=5). f. p-p38, pERK1/2 and pJNK levels in DC, untreated or incubated with alloIgG-IC. Graphs show arcsinh ratios of phospho-species in DC incubated for 5 min with LMP lysate or alloIgG-IC over baseline levels from unstimulated DC (n=5). g. MHCII and CD86 expression and CFSE internalization by TADC after overnight culture with CFSE-labeled alloIgG-IC (n=4). Experiments were independently repeated at least 3 times and analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Injection of tumors in situ with alloantibodies in combination with CD40 agonists and TNFα induces systemic DC-mediated anti-tumor immunity
a. Growth of tumors injected with alloIgG, with or without immune stimuli (n=6). b. Mean fluorescence of PE in myeloid cells from B16-bearing mice 2h after treatment (n=4). c. CD86 and MHCII expression on DC from B16 tumors 5d following treatment (n=6). d. B16 growth in mice vaccinated with 2x106 DC transferred from treated or untreated B16 tumors (n=6). e. Tumor number in Tyr:CreER;BrafV600E/Ptenlox/lox mice following treatment (n=4). Photographs show representative mice on the day of treatment and after day 24. f. 4T1 tumor size in mice following treatment (n=5). g. Mean counts of visible lung metastases, photographs and histology on day 30 (magnification: 10x, n=5). h. CFSE internalization and CD40/CD86 co-expression on TADC from lung cancer patients cultured overnight with CFSE-stained autologous tumor cells coated with selfIgG or alloIgG (n=2). i. HLA-DR upregulation by DC (left) and proliferative response of CD4+ T cells (right) from mesothelioma (MSTO) patients after culture of autologous BMDC with selfIgG- or alloIgG-coated autologous tumor cells (n=2). Mouse experiments were independently repeated at least 3 times and analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. Asterisk (*) denotes p<0.05 and two asterisks (**) denote p<0.01.

Comment in

  • Immunotherapy: Put your coat on!
    McCarthy N. McCarthy N. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jun;15(6):319. doi: 10.1038/nrc3964. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25998707 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coussens LM, Zitvogel L, Palucka AK. Neutralizing tumor-promoting chronic inflammation: a magic bullet? Science. 2013;339:286–291. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–899. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer cell. 2012;21:309–322. - PubMed
    1. Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science. 2011;331:1565–1570. - PubMed
    1. Vesely MD, Kershaw MH, Schreiber RD, Smyth MJ. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Annual review of immunology. 2011;29:235–271. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms