Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jun;145(6):1170-7.
doi: 10.3945/jn.114.204339. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

Fat emulsion intragastric stability and droplet size modulate gastrointestinal responses and subsequent food intake in young adults

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Fat emulsion intragastric stability and droplet size modulate gastrointestinal responses and subsequent food intake in young adults

Mahamoud O Hussein et al. J Nutr. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Intragastric creaming and droplet size of fat emulsions may affect intragastric behavior and gastrointestinal and satiety responses.

Objectives: We tested the hypotheses that gastrointestinal physiologic responses and satiety will be increased by an increase in intragastric stability and by a decrease in fat droplet size of a fat emulsion.

Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized crossover study in 11 healthy persons [8 men and 3 women, aged 24 ± 1 y; body mass index (in kg/m(2)): 24.4 ± 0.9] who consumed meals containing 300-g 20% oil and water emulsion (2220 kJ) with 1) larger, 6-μm mean droplet size (Coarse treatment) expected to cream in the stomach; 2) larger, 6-μm mean droplet size with 0.5% locust bean gum (LBG; Coarse+LBG treatment) to prevent creaming; or 3) smaller, 0.4-μm mean droplet size with LBG (Fine+LBG treatment). The participants were imaged hourly by using MRI and food intake was assessed by using a meal that participants consumed ad libitum.

Results: The Coarse+LBG treatment (preventing creaming in the stomach) slowed gastric emptying, resulting in 12% higher gastric volume over time (P < 0.001), increased small bowel water content (SBWC) by 11% (P < 0.01), slowed appearance of the (13)C label in the breath by 17% (P < 0.01), and reduced food intake by 9% (P < 0.05) compared with the Coarse treatment. The Fine+LBG treatment (smaller droplet size) slowed gastric emptying, resulting in 18% higher gastric volume (P < 0.001), increased SBWC content by 15% (P < 0.01), and significantly reduced food intake by 11% (P < 0.05, equivalent to an average of 411 kJ less energy consumed) compared with the Coarse+LBG treatment. These high-fat meals stimulated substantial increases in SBWC, which increased to a peak at 4 h at 568 mL (range: 150-854 mL; P < 0.01) for the Fine+LBG treatment.

Conclusion: Manipulating intragastric stability and fat emulsion droplet size can influence human gastrointestinal physiology and food intake.

Keywords: food intake; lipid; magnetic resonance imaging; physical form of food; small bowel; stomach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: MO Hussein, CL Hoad, J Wright, G Singh, MC Stephenson, EF Cox, E Placidi, SE Pritchard, C Costigan, H Ribeiro, E Ciampi, A Nandi, N Hedges, P Sanderson, HPF Peters, P Rayment, RC Spiller, PA Gowland, and L Marciani, no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic diagram of the predicted behavior in the stomach of the 3 meals containing 20% sunflower oil in water emulsions: Coarse, Coarse+LBG, and Fine+LBG. The black dots represent the fat droplets, which are small for the Fine emulsion and large for the Coarse and Coarse+LBG emulsions. The arrows indicate the predicted different appearance of the treatments in the stomach when changing intragastric stability and droplet size of the emulsions. Coarse, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size; Coarse+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; Fine+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 0.4-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; LBG, locust bean gum.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The upper part of the panel shows typical balanced turbo field echo (water) images taken across the stomach of the same healthy young adult at time t = 2 h after consumption of each of the 3 test meals containing a 20% sunflower oil in water emulsion on the 3 separate study days: Coarse, Coarse+LBG, and Fine+LBG. The lower part of the panel shows the corresponding fat-only images. These show that the LBG-stabilized emulsions did not phase separate in the stomach, whereas the Coarse meal shows a clear creamed fat layer on top of the stomach contents. Coarse, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size; Coarse+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; Fine+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 0.4-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; LBG, locust bean gum.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Volume of the gastric contents over time for healthy young adults after they consumed the 3 meals containing a 20% sunflower oil in water emulsion on the 3 separate study days: Coarse, Coarse+LBG, and Fine+LBG. Values are means ± SEMs, n = 11. The arrow indicates the meal time. Coarse, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size; Coarse+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; Fine+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 0.4-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; LBG, locust bean gum.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Lipid:water ratio measured from spectroscopy voxels placed in the upper (A) and the lower (B) part of the stomach of healthy young adults after consumption of the 3 meals containing a 20% sunflower oil in water emulsion on the 3 separate study days: Coarse, Coarse+LBG, and Fine+LBG. Values are means ± SEMs, n = 11. The arrow indicates the meal time. Coarse, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size; Coarse+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; Fine+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 0.4-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; LBG, locust bean gum.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
On the left side of the panel is a coronal anatomic “roadmap” dual-echo MRI image. The other images are corresponding small bowel water images taken across the small bowel of the same healthy young adult at time t = 4 h after consumption of each of the 3 meals containing a 20% sunflower oil in water emulsion on the 3 separate study days: Coarse, Coarse+LBG, and Fine+LBG. These images show the large amount of freely mobile fluid present in the small bowel in response to the fat emulsion meals. Coarse, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size; Coarse+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; Fine+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 0.4-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; LBG, locust bean gum.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Small bowel water content volume over time for healthy young adults after they consumed the 3 meals containing a 20% sunflower oil in water emulsion on the 3 separate study days: Coarse, Coarse+LBG, and Fine+LBG. Values are means ± SEMs, n = 11. Coarse, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size; Coarse+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; Fine+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 0.4-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; LBG, locust bean gum.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Weight of food consumed ad libitum from a pasta meal by healthy young adults after they consumed the 3 meals containing a 20% sunflower oil in water emulsion on the 3 separate study days: Coarse, Coarse+LBG, and Fine+LBG. Values are means ± SEMs, n = 11. Labeled means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05. Coarse, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size; Coarse+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 6-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; Fine+LBG, 20% oil and water emulsion with 0.4-μm mean droplet size and 0.5% locust bean gum; LBG, locust bean gum.

References

    1. McLaughlin J. Long-chain fatty acid sensing in the gastrointestinal tract. Biochem Soc Trans 2007;35:1199–202. - PubMed
    1. Maljaars PWJ, Peters HPF, Kodde A, Geraedts M, Troost FJ, Haddeman E, Masclee AAM. Length and site of the small intestine exposed to fat influences hunger and food intake. Br J Nutr 2011;106:1609–15. - PubMed
    1. Golding M, Wooster TJ, Day L, Xu M, Lundin L, Keogh J, Clifton P. Impact of gastric structuring on the lipolysis of emulsified lipids. Soft Matter 2011;7:3513–23.
    1. Cunningham KM, Baker RJ, Horowitz M, Maddox AF, Edelbroek MAL, Chatterton BE. Use of technetium-99m(V)thiocyanate to measure gastric emptying of fat. J Nucl Med 1991;32:878–81. - PubMed
    1. Jian R, Vigneron N, Najean Y, Bernier JJ. Gastric emptying and intragastric distribution of lipids in man—a new scintigraphic method of study. Dig Dis Sci 1982;27:705–11. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms