Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr 9:9:2079-88.
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S78757. eCollection 2015.

Management of severe sepsis: advances, challenges, and current status

Affiliations
Review

Management of severe sepsis: advances, challenges, and current status

Ignacio Martin-Loeches et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. .

Abstract

The complexity of treating severe sepsis and septic shock has been elucidated in myriad studies, particularly in the past 10 years. The development of clinical guidelines, insight into the effect of bundle elements, and results of clinical trials have brought to light further opportunities and questions in the approach to pharmaceutical interventions for the global challenge to save lives and reduce healthcare costs. Therapeutic interventions including fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic monitoring, glycemic control, corticosteroids, and antimicrobial therapy and stewardship inform outcomes. Research on biomarkers, use of mesenchymal stem cells, blood purification, immunoglobulins, and antioxidative treatments apropos the immune response may soon yield viable therapies.

Keywords: biomarkers; critical care; guidelines; sepsis; septic shock; surviving sepsis campaign.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fluid administration between 0 and 6 hours. Abbreviations: ProCESS, Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock; EGDT, Early Goal-Directed Therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Steroids for treatment of infections, sepsis, and septic shock – ups and downs. Abbreviations: SSC, Surviving Sepsis Campaign.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1303–1310. - PubMed
    1. Kaukonen K-M, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1308–1316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(1):3–12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin-Loeches I, de Haro C, Dellinger RP, et al. Effectiveness of an inspiratory pressure-limited approach to mechanical ventilation in septic patients. Eur Respir J. 2013;41(1):157–164. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00221611. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lyle NH, Pena OM, Boyd JH, Hancock REW. Barriers to the effective treatment of sepsis: antimicrobial agents, sepsis definitions, and host-directed therapies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1323:101–114. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12444. - DOI - PubMed