Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 25:8:48.
doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-48. eCollection 2014.

Properties of the Portuguese version of the empowerment scale with mental health organization users

Maria Fátima Jorge-Monteiro  1 , José Henrique Ornelas  1
Affiliations

Properties of the Portuguese version of the empowerment scale with mental health organization users

Maria Fátima Jorge-Monteiro et al. Int J Ment Health Syst. .

Abstract

Background: This study examines the reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Empowerment Scale (ES) to be used in the community/psychosocial mental health field. Authors also reviewed the properties of the development and cross-cultural adaptation of the ES. Because mental health services are required to encourage empowerment and recovery-oriented interventions, adequate empowerment-oriented outcome measures are needed to evaluate services and study interventions across countries.

Methods: The current research was part of a larger research project with 213 participants. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to observe the ES's construct-related validity, and a reliability analysis for internal consistency. The ES concurrent validity with the recovery and psychiatric symptoms measures was also assessed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The CFA supported the five-factor configuration for the refined model of measure as satisfactory. The Portuguese version of the ES presented an overall satisfactory reliability (α = .79) and was positively correlated with personal recovery (r = .71) and inversely with psychiatric symptoms (r = -.22).

Conclusions: The overall scale was considered reliable and valid to be used by Portuguese researchers and practitioners to evaluate empowering interventions in mental health services. Furthermore, in the effort to increase ES construct-related validity, this article suggests further improvements to enhance the empowerment measure.

Keywords: Empowerment scale; Mental health; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nelson G, Lord J, Ochocka J. Shifting the Paradigm in Community Mental Health: Towards Empowerment and Community. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2001.
    1. Nelson G, Kloos B, Ornelas J. Community Psychology and Community Mental Health: Towards Transformative Change. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
    1. Ornelas J, Vargas-Moniz M, Duarte T. Community psychology and social change: a story from the field of mental health in Portugal. Global J Community Psychol Pract. 2010;1(1):21–31.
    1. Chamberlin J. A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1997;20(4):43–46.
    1. Wakefield PA, Randall GE, Richards DA. Identifying barriers to mental health system improvements: An examination of community participation in assertive community treatment programs. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2011;5:27. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-5-27. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources