Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125327.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125327. eCollection 2015.

Multi-Level Effects of Low Dose Rate Ionizing Radiation on Southern Toad, Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris

Affiliations

Multi-Level Effects of Low Dose Rate Ionizing Radiation on Southern Toad, Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris

Karolina Stark et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Despite their potential vulnerability to contaminants from exposure at multiple life stages, amphibians are one of the least studied groups of vertebrates in ecotoxicology, and research on radiation effects in amphibians is scarce. We used multiple endpoints to assess the radiosensitivity of the southern toad (Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris) during its pre-terrestrial stages of development -embryonic, larval, and metamorphic. Toads were exposed, from several hours after oviposition through metamorphosis (up to 77 days later), to four low dose rates of 137Cs at 0.13, 2.4, 21, and 222 mGy d-1, resulting in total doses up to 15.8 Gy. Radiation treatments did not affect hatching success of embryos, larval survival, or the length of the larval period. The individual family variation in hatching success of embryos was larger than the radiation response. In contrast, newly metamorphosed individuals from the higher dose-rate treatments had higher mass and mass/length body indices, a measure which may relate to higher post-metamorphic survival. The increased mass and index at higher dose rates may indicate that the chronic, low dose rate radiation exposures triggered secondary responses. Additionally, the increases in growth were linked to a decrease in DNA damage (as measured by the Comet Assay) in red blood cells at a dose rate of 21 mGy d-1 and a total dose of 1.1 Gy. In conclusion, the complex effects of low dose rates of ionizing radiation may trigger growth and cellular repair mechanisms in amphibian larvae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Hatching success of embryos.
Hatching success for three clutches of Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris embryos exposed for 10 days to low dose ionizing radiation from 137Cs. The four different radiation treatments (mGy d-1) are indicated on the x-axis. The error bars indicate standard errors of the means.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Larval survival until metamorphosis.
Percent larval survival until metamorphosis of Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris tadpoles exposed to four dose rates of 137Cs presented as average (top figure) and per clutch (bottom figure). Because dragonfly predation caused density effects, only bucket with >20–30 tadpoles were included in the analysis. The error bars indicate standard errors of the means.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Body size after metamophosis.
Body Index (mass/snout-to-vent length; g/mm) of metamorphosed Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris tadpoles exposed continuously to radiation during their larval period presented as average per bucket (top figure) and as average per egg clutch with standard error (bottom figure). The four 137Cs radiation treatments (0.13, 2.4, 21, and 222 mGy d-1) are indicated on the x-axis. Because dragonfly predation caused density effects, only buckets with >20–30 tadpoles were included in the analysis.
Fig 4
Fig 4. DNA damage in blood cells.
Percentage of migrated DNA in red blood cells of a subsample of individuals of newly metamorphosed Anaxyrus [Bufo] terrestris exposed since embryos to four radiation dose rates of 137Cs. Results are presented as average per sample (top figure) and as average per egg clutch with standard error (bottom figure).

References

    1. Stuart S N, Chanson J S, Cox N A, Young B E, Rodrigues A S L, Fischman D L, et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 2004; 306: 1783–1786. - PubMed
    1. Blaustein A R, Han B A, Relyea R A, Johnson P T J, Buck J C, Gervasi S S, et al. The complexity of amphibian population declines: understanding the role of cofactors in driving amphibian losses. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2011; 1223: 108–119. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05909.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seale D. Influence of amphibian larvae on primary production, nutrient flux, and competition in a pond ecosystem. Ecol. 1980; 61(6): 1531–1550.
    1. Beard K H, Vogt K A, Kulmatiski A. Top-down effects of a terrestrial frog on forest nutrient dynamics. Oecologica 2002; 133: 583–593. - PubMed
    1. Gibbons J W, Winne C T, Scott D E, Willson J D, Glaudas X, Andrews K M, et al. Remarkable amphibian biomass and abundance in an isolated wetland: implications for wetland conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2006; 20: 1457–1465. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources