Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries
- PMID: 25927972
- PMCID: PMC4430987
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-48
Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries
Abstract
Background: Care homes are increasingly becoming places where people spend the final stages of their lives and eventually die. This trend is expected to continue due to population ageing, yet little is known about public preferences regarding this setting. As part of a larger study examining preferences and priorities for end of life care, we investigated the extent to which care homes are chosen as the least preferred place of death, and the factors associated with this negative preference.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey among 9,344 adults from random private households in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. We asked participants where they would least prefer to die in a situation of serious illness with less than one year to live. Multivariate binary logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with choosing care homes as the least preferred place of death in each country.
Results: Care homes were the most frequently mentioned least preferred place of death in the Netherlands (41.5%), Italy and Spain (both 36.7%) and the second most frequent in England (28.0%), Portugal (25.8%), Germany (23.7%) and Flanders (18.9%). Only two factors had a similar and significant effect on the least preferred place of death in more than one country. In Germany and the Netherlands those doing housework were less likely to choose care homes as their least preferred place (AOR 0.72; 95% CI:0.54-0.96 and AOR 0.68; 95% CI:0.52-0.90 respectively), while those born in the country where the survey took place were more likely to choose care homes (AOR 1.77; 95% CI:1.05-2.99 and AOR 1.74; 95% CI:1.03-2.95 respectively). Experiences of serious illness, death and dying were not associated with the preference.
Conclusions: Our results suggest it might be difficult to promote care homes as a good place to die. This is an urgent research area in order to meet needs and preferences of a growing number of older people with chronic, debilitating conditions across Europe. From a research perspective and in order to allow people to be cared for and die where they wish, our findings highlight the need to build more in depth evidence on reasons underlying this negative preference.
References
-
- Gomes B, Cohen J, Deliens L, Higginson IJ. International trends in circumstances of death and dying. In: Gott M, Ingleton C, editors. Living with Ageing and Dying Palliative and End of Life Care for older People. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. pp. 3–18.
-
- Calanzani N, Higginson IJ, Gomes B. Current and Future Needs for Hospice Care: an Evidence-based Report. London: Commission into the Future of Hospice Care; 2013.
-
- van der Steen J, Helton MR, Sloane PD, Ribbe MW. Palliative care in institutional long-term care settings. In: Cohen J, Deliens L, editors. A Public Health Perspective on End of Life Care. 1. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 122–134.
-
- Office for National Statistics: Mortality Statistics. Deaths Registered in England and Wales 2012. Table 13. Deaths: area of usual residence and sex, by place of occurrence, numbers and percentages.http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=...
Pre-publication history
-
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-684X/13/48/prepub
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
