Comparison of imaging modalities for detection of residual fragments and prediction of stone related events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy
- PMID: 25928513
- PMCID: PMC4752060
- DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.12
Comparison of imaging modalities for detection of residual fragments and prediction of stone related events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving stone free status (SFS) is the goal of stone surgery. In this study it is aimed to compare effectiveness of unenhanced helical computerized tomography (UHCT), KUB and ultrasonography (US) for detection of residual RFs and predicition of stone releated events following percutaneous nephrolitotomy (PNL).
Materials and methods: Patients underwent PNL for radiopaque stones between November 2007 and February 2010 were followed. Patients were examined within 24-48 hours after the procedure by KUB, US and UHCT. For stone size 4 mm was accepted as cut off level of significance.Sensitivity and specificity of KUB and US for detection of RFs and value of them for prediction of stone related events were calculated.
Results: SFS was achieved in 95 patients (54.9%) and when cut off value of 4 mm for RFs was employed, SFS was achieved in 131 patients (75.7%). Sensitivity was 70.5% for KUB, and 52.5% for US. UHCT was shown to be significantly more efficient for detection of RFs compared to both KUB (p=0.01) and US (p=0.001). When cut off level of 4 mm employed, sensitivity of KUB and US increased to 85.7% and 57.1%. Statistical significant superiority of UHCT still remained (p value vs. KUB: 0.03 and p value vs. US: 0.008).
Conclusion: UHCT is the most sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting RFs after PNL. It has higher sensitivity regardless of stone size compared to KUB and US. Additionally UHCT has higher capability of predicting occurrence of stone related events.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
[Ultrasonography plus direct radiography of the abdomen in the diagnosis of renal colic: still a valid approach?].Radiol Med. 2001 Oct;102(4):222-5. Radiol Med. 2001. PMID: 11740448 Italian.
-
Useful prediction of ureteral calculi visibility on abdominal radiographs based on calculi characteristics on unenhanced helical CT and CT scout radiographs.Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):292-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01861.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19196367
-
Urolithiasis: how accurate are plain radiographs?Can Assoc Radiol J. 2008 Jun;59(3):131-4. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2008. PMID: 18697719
-
Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1937-1. Epub 2003 Jul 24. Eur Radiol. 2003. PMID: 12898174 Review.
-
An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques.Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Nov;13(11):654-662. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.154. Epub 2016 Aug 31. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27578040 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Residual stone fragments: systematic review of definitions, diagnostic standards.World J Urol. 2025 Mar 28;43(1):194. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05572-x. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40148697 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of a single institution experience over 25 years.Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Oct;13(10):E317-E324. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5725. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019. PMID: 31364972 Free PMC article.
-
International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management.World J Urol. 2024 Mar 25;42(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04816-6. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38526675
-
First Clinical Experience of a Novel Pulsed Solid-State Thulium:YAG Laser during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 29;12(7):2588. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072588. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37048670 Free PMC article.
-
Early ureteroscopic lithotripsy in acute renal colic caused by ureteral calculi.Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Jan;52(1):15-19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02298-9. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020. PMID: 31586281
References
-
- Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A, Bensalah K, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y, et al. Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 2009;181:1163–1168. - PubMed
-
- Sountoulides P, Metaxa L, Cindolo L. Is computed tomography mandatory for the detection of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol. 2013;27:1341–1348. - PubMed
-
- Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Refai H, Elnahas A, Shoma A, Eraky I, et al. Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol. 2008;179:198–200. discussion 200. - PubMed
-
- Lehtoranta K, Mankinen P, Taari K, Rannikko S, Lehtonen T, Salo J. Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy; sensitivities of different imaging methods in renal stone detection. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1995;84:43–49. - PubMed
-
- Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2007;21:684–687. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources