Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 1:15:448.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1791-5.

Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches

Clementine Calba  1   2   3 , Flavie L Goutard  4 , Linda Hoinville  5 , Pascal Hendrikx  6 , Ann Lindberg  7 , Claude Saegerman  8 , Marisa Peyre  9
Affiliations

Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches

Clementine Calba et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Regular and relevant evaluations of surveillance systems are essential to improve their performance and cost-effectiveness. With this in mind several organizations have developed evaluation approaches to facilitate the design and implementation of these evaluations.

Methods: In order to identify and to compare the advantages and limitations of these approaches, we implemented a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).

Results: After applying exclusion criteria and identifying other additional documents via citations, 15 documents were retained. These were analysed to assess the field (public or animal health) and the type of surveillance systems targeted; the development process; the objectives; the evaluation process and its outputs; and the attributes covered. Most of the approaches identified were general and provided broad recommendations for evaluation. Several common steps in the evaluation process were identified: (i) defining the surveillance system under evaluation, (ii) designing the evaluation process, (iii) implementing the evaluation, and (iv) drawing conclusions and recommendations.

Conclusions: A lack of information regarding the identification and selection of methods and tools to assess the evaluation attributes was highlighted; as well as a lack of consideration of economic attributes and sociological aspects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart diagram of studies selection process to include in the systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of evaluation approaches which take into consideration each evaluation attribute identified in this review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Declich S, Carter A. Public health surveillance: historical origins, methods and evaluation. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72:285–304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corley CD, Lancaster MJ, Brigantic RT, Chung JS, Walters RA, Arthur RR, Bruckner-Lea CJ, Calapristi A, Dowling G, Hartley DM. Assessing the continuum of event-based biosurveillance through an operational lens. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012;10:131–41. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0096. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drewe J, Hoinville L, Cook A, Floyd T, Stärk K. Evaluation of animal and public health surveillance systems: a systematic review. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140:575–90. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811002160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahab S. Finding value in the evaluation of public health syndromic surveillance systems from a policy perspective. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Health Services; 2009. Finding value in the evaluation of public health syndromic surveillance systems from a policy perspective; pp. 1–24.
    1. Health Surveillance Coordinating Committee . Framework and tools for evaluating health surveillance systems. Vancouver, Canada: Health Canada; 2004. Framework and tools for evaluating health surveillance systems.

Publication types

MeSH terms