Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125298.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125298. eCollection 2015.

Task type affects location of language-positive cortical regions by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Task type affects location of language-positive cortical regions by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping

Theresa Hauck et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: Recent repetitive TMS (rTMS) mapping protocols for language mapping revealed deficits of this method, mainly in posterior brain regions. Therefore this study analyzed the impact of different language tasks on the localization of language-positive brain regions and compared their effectiveness, especially with regard to posterior brain regions.

Methods: Nineteen healthy, right-handed subjects performed object naming, pseudoword reading, verb generation, and action naming during rTMS language mapping of the left hemisphere. Synchronically, 5 Hz/10 pulses were applied with a 0 ms delay.

Results: The object naming task evoked the highest error rate (14%), followed by verb generation (13%) and action naming (11%). The latter revealed more errors in posterior than in anterior areas. Pseudoword reading barely generated errors, except for phonological paraphasias.

Conclusions: In general, among the evaluated language tasks, object naming is the most discriminative task to detect language-positive regions via rTMS. However, other tasks might be used for more specific questions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Outline of the 46 stimulated cortical spots.
Each point was stimulated for three times.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Error rates per stimulation spot during object naming, pseudoword reading, verb generation, and action naming.
Results are presented for all regions (a), for anterior regions (b), and for posterior regions (c).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Overall error rates revealed by language mapping via rTMS.
Distribution of elicited naming errors while performing object naming (a), pseudoword reading (b), verb generation (c), and action naming (d).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Error type (%) differences across task types.
Error rates per error category during object naming, pseudoword reading, verb generation, and action naming shown for all regions, anterior regions, and posterior regions.

References

    1. Salmelin R, Helenius P, Service E (2000) Neurophysiology of fluent and impaired reading: a magnetoencephalographic approach. J Clin Neurophysiol 17: 163–174. - PubMed
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Gates JR, Dhuna A (1991) Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 41: 697–702. - PubMed
    1. Epstein CM, Lah JJ, Meador K, Weissman JD, Gaitan LE, Dihenia B (1996) Optimum stimulus parameters for lateralized suppression of speech with magnetic brain stimulation. Neurology 47: 1590–1593. - PubMed
    1. Wassermann EM, Blaxton TA, Hoffman EA, Berry CD, Oletsky H, Pascual-Leone A, et al. (1999) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dominant hemisphere can disrupt visual naming in temporal lobe epilepsy patients. Neuropsychologia 37: 537–544. - PubMed
    1. Sollmann N, Picht T, Makela JP, Meyer B, Ringel F, Krieg SM (2013) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative language mapping in a patient with a left frontoopercular glioblastoma. J Neurosurg 118: 175–179. 10.3171/2012.9.JNS121053 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources