Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):314-23.
doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140714-LIT-333.

The role of behavioral economic incentive design and demographic characteristics in financial incentive-based approaches to changing health behaviors: a meta-analysis

Meta-Analysis

The role of behavioral economic incentive design and demographic characteristics in financial incentive-based approaches to changing health behaviors: a meta-analysis

Nancy Haff et al. Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of behavioral economics to design financial incentives to promote health behavior change and to explore associations with demographic characteristics.

Data source: Studies performed by the Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania published between January 2006 and March 2014.

Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: Randomized, controlled trials with available participant-level data. Studies that did not use financial incentives to promote health behavior change were excluded.

Data extraction: Participant-level data from seven studies were pooled.

Data synthesis: Meta-analysis on the pooled sample using a random-effects model with interaction terms to examine treatment effects and whether they varied by incentive structure or demographic characteristics.

Results: The pooled study sample comprised 1403 participants, of whom 35% were female, 70% were white, 24% were black, and the mean age was 48 years (standard deviation 11.2 years). In the fully adjusted model, participants offered financial incentives had higher odds of behavior change (odds ratio [OR]: 3.96; p < .01) when compared to control. There were no significant interactions between financial incentives and gender, age, race, income, or education. When further adjusting for incentive structure, blacks had higher odds than whites of achieving behavior change (OR: 1.67; p < .05) with a conditional payment. Compared to lower-income participants, higher-income participants had lower odds of behavior change (OR: 0.46; p = .01) with a regret lottery.

Conclusion: Financial incentives designed using concepts from behavioral economics were effective for promoting health behavior change. There were no large and consistent relationships between the effectiveness of financial incentives and observable demographic characteristics. Second-order examinations of incentive structure suggest potential relationships among the effectiveness of financial incentives, incentive structure, and the demographic characteristics of race and income.

Keywords: Age; Behavioral Economics; Demographics; Education; Financial Incentives; Gender; Health Behavior Change; Health focus: smoking control, weight control, medication adherence; Incentive Structure; Income; Manuscript format: research; Outcome measure: behavioral; Race; Research purpose: modeling/relationship testing; Setting: national; Strategy: incentives; Study design: meta-analysis; Target population circumstances: all education levels, all income levels, all races/ethnicities; Target population: adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources