Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Feb;20(2):263-73.
doi: 10.1002/ejp.719. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Efficacy and safety of nicoboxil/nonivamide ointment for the treatment of acute pain in the low back - A randomized, controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of nicoboxil/nonivamide ointment for the treatment of acute pain in the low back - A randomized, controlled trial

M Gaubitz et al. Eur J Pain. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Until now, nonivamide/nicoboxil ointment has not been tested in a randomized trial for the treatment of acute non-specific low back pain.

Methods: This phase III randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial investigated efficacy, safety and tolerability of topical nicoboxil 2.5%/nonivamide 0.4% for treatment of acute non-specific low back pain [primary endpoint: pain intensity (PI) difference between pre-dose baseline and 8 h after the first application].

Results: Patients (n = 805), 18-74 years of age were treated for up to 4 days with nicoboxil 2.5%/nonivamide 0.4%, nicoboxil 2.5%, nonivamide 0.4% or placebo ointment. Pre-dose baseline pain intensity (6.6 on a 0- to 10-point numerical rating scale) was reduced by 1.049 points with placebo, by 1.428 points with nicoboxil, by 2.252 points with nonivamide and by 2.410 points with nicoboxil/nonivamide after 8 h (p < 0.0001 for nicoboxil/nonivamide vs. placebo, nicoboxil; p = 0.4171 for nicoboxil/nonivamide vs. nonivamide). At the end of treatment, the combination provided more pronounced PI reduction (3.540 points) compared with nicoboxil (2.371, p < 0.0001), nonivamide (3.074, p = 0.0259) and placebo (1.884, p < 0.0001). Low back mobility scores on Day 1 were better for the combination compared with all other treatments (p < 0.044); on Day 2-4, scores were better than for placebo and nicoboxil (p < 0.003). Patients assessed efficacy of the combination as greater than of the comparators (p ≤ 0.0129). All treatments were tolerated well. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Nicoboxil/nonivamide ointment is an effective, well-tolerated medication for the treatment of acute non-specific low back pain.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01708915.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pain intensity differences (PIDs) up to 8 h after the first application of ointment containing placebo (PLA), nicoboxil, nonivamide or the combination of nicoboxil and nonivamide. Ointment was applied at 0 and 4 h. The combination reduced PID by more than 1 point compared with placebo, and by more than 2 points compared with baseline (BL). Data are shown as adjusted means with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The statistical model included baseline pain intensity, centre, time (0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h), treatment and treatment‐by‐time interaction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average pain intensity differences (APIDs) from Day 1 to Day 4. All treatments reduced APID over the treatment period, with the most pronounced effects for nicoboxil/nonivamide. The number of patients with available PI data for the treatment days shows that a relatively high number did not continue treatment over the entire (allowed) 4‐day period. Data are shown as adjusted means with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The statistical model included baseline pain intensity, centre, time (Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4), treatment and treatment‐by‐time interaction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babej‐Doelle, R. , Freytag, S. , Eckmeyer, J. , Zerle, G. , Schinzel, S. , Schmieder, G. , Stankov, G. (1994). Parenteral dipyrone versus diclofenac and placebo in patients with acute lumbago or sciatic pain: Randomized observer‐blind multicenter study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 32, 204–209. - PubMed
    1. Bley, K. (2013). Effects of topical capsaicin on cutaneous innervation: Implications for pain management. Open Pain J 6, 81–94.
    1. Buynak, R. , Shapiro, D.Y. , Okamoto, A. , Van Hove, I. , Rauschkolb, C. , Steup, A. , Lange, B. , Lange, C. , Etropolski, M. (2010). Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain: Results of a prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐ and active‐controlled Phase III study. Expert Opin Pharmacother 11, 1787–1804. - PubMed
    1. Casser, H.‐R. (2012). Definition, Epidemiologie und soziooekonomische Bedeutung des nichtspezifischen Kreuzschmerz. Orthopaede 41, 311–312. - PubMed
    1. Chitil, W. , Ortner, H. (1959). Clinical experiences with Finalgon ointment in a total of 1040 cases. Prakt Arzt 13, 201–207.

Publication types

Associated data