The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
- PMID: 25931683
- PMCID: PMC4395667
- DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.571
The effect of foot position on erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation during sit-to-stand performed by chronic stroke patients
Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to use surface electromyography (EMG) to investigate the effects of different foot positioning on bilateral erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) activation during sit-to-stand performed by individuals with stroke. [Subjects] Fifteen randomly selected participants with stroke were enrolled in this study. [Methods] All the participants were asked to perform sit-to-stand (STS) using three different strategies: (1) symmetric foot position, (2) unaffected foot placed behind the affected foot position (asymmetric-1), (3) affected foot placed behind the unaffected foot position (asymmetric-2). An EMG system was used to measure ES and GM muscle activities. The strategies were performed in a random order, and the mean values of five measurements were used in the analysis. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of differences between the conditions. [Results] The affected ES muscle activity was significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4) than in symmetrical foot placement (149.8±54.2). In addition, the affected ES, unaffected ES, and affected GM muscle activity were significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4, 173.5±83.1, 98.3±90.3 respectively) than in asymmetric-1 foot placement (147.3±53.8, 151.2±76.5, 84.9±73.8 respectively). [Conclusion] Our results suggest that it may be more desirable for persons with stroke to place the affected foot behind the unaffected foot when performing STS to increase affected ES and GM muscle activation.
Keywords: Electromyography; Sit-to-stand; Stroke.
Similar articles
-
Muscle activity and balance control during sit-to-stand across symmetric and asymmetric initial foot positions in healthy adults.Gait Posture. 2019 Jun;71:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.030. Epub 2019 May 1. Gait Posture. 2019. PMID: 31063929
-
The effects of foot position on the performance of the sit-to-stand movement with chronic stroke subjects.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb;90(2):314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.023. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19236986 Clinical Trial.
-
Optimal foot-position of caregiver based on muscle activity of lower back and lower limb while providing sit-to-stand support.J Phys Ther Sci. 2020;32(8):534-540. doi: 10.1589/jpts.32.534. Epub 2020 Aug 8. J Phys Ther Sci. 2020. PMID: 32884176 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Muscle Activation and Ground Reaction Force of the Lower Limbs According to Foot Placement During Sit-to-Stand Training in Stroke Patients.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr;99(4):330-337. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001335. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 32195716
-
Impact of sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients: sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients.Open Med (Wars). 2016 Aug 13;11(1):330-335. doi: 10.1515/med-2016-0061. eCollection 2016. Open Med (Wars). 2016. PMID: 28352817 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion.J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Dec;27(12):3883-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3883. Epub 2015 Dec 28. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015. PMID: 26834373 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in movements of neck, trunk, and hip according to height and foot position during sit-to-stand.J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Oct;28(10):2717-2721. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.2717. Epub 2016 Oct 28. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016. PMID: 27821921 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of different sitting positions on skin temperature of the lower extremity.J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Aug;27(8):2637-40. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2637. Epub 2015 Aug 21. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015. PMID: 26355265 Free PMC article.
-
Muscular Activity and Fatigue in Lower-Limb and Trunk Muscles during Different Sit-To-Stand Tests.PLoS One. 2015 Oct 27;10(10):e0141675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141675. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26506612 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nichols DS: Balance retraining after stroke using force platform biofeedback. Phys Ther, 1997, 77: 553–558. - PubMed
-
- Mak MK, Levin O, Mizrahi J, et al. : Joint torques during sit-to-stand in healthy subjects and people with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2003, 18: 197–206. - PubMed
-
- Chou SW, Wong AM, Leong CP, et al. : Postural control during sit-to stand and gait in stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 82: 42–47. - PubMed
-
- Dickstein R, Nissan M, Pillar T, et al. : Foot-ground pressure pattern of standing hemiplegic patients. Major characteristics and patterns of improvement. Phys Ther, 1984, 64: 19–23. - PubMed
-
- Camargos AC, Rodrigues-de-Paula-Goulart F, Teixeira-Salmela LF: The effects of foot position on the performance of the sit-to-stand movement with chronic stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2009, 90: 314–319. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources