Review of our ileal pouch experience in the light of literature
- PMID: 25931950
- PMCID: PMC4415552
- DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2014.2758
Review of our ileal pouch experience in the light of literature
Abstract
Objective: Retrospective proctocolectomy is a distinguished, sphincter saving treatment used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and FAP disease. We aimed to evaluate ileal pouch interventions performed at our clinic and their results in the light of literature.
Material and methods: Medical records of 35 restorative proctocolectomy and J pouch ileo-anal anastomosis surgeries performed at Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram School of Medicine between the years 2006-2013 were retrospectively examined. The patients were assessed according to their age, gender, length of hospital stay, diagnosis, follow-up duration and pouch-related complications. All patients were contacted by phone and they were scheduled for controls at the outpatient clinic.
Results: Nineteen patients were male (54%) and 16 were female (46%). Their mean age was 45 years (21-74). The mean length of hospital stay was 11 (5-20) days. Twenty two (63%) patients were operated on due to FAP, 12 (34%) due to synchronous rectum cancer and colon tumor or polyp, and one (3%) due to ulcerative colitis. All patients received J pouch and protective ileostomy. After the closure of ileostomy, two cases were identified to have J pouch fistulas. The patients were followed up for 6 months to 7 years. They were contacted by phone and they were questioned about their active complaints, number of defecations, urinary and sexual dysfunctions. It was identified that they had 5 (3-8) defecations per day on average and that 4 (11%) cases had one nocturnal defecation. No pouchitis was identified in the follow-up endoscopic examinations.
Conclusion: Restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis technique is a surgical procedure that can be performed with low rates of morbidity and mortality, including the elderly.
Keywords: Ileal pouches; ileo-anal anastomosis; restorative proctocolectomy.
Similar articles
-
[Proctocolectomy with J pouch. Ileo-anal anastomosis performed with PPH stapler. Our experiences after 88 cases].Magy Seb. 2016 Dec;69(4):159-164. doi: 10.1556/1046.69.2016.4.3. Magy Seb. 2016. PMID: 27991017 Hungarian.
-
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: twenty years follow-up in 174 patients.Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Jan;7(1):23-7. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005. PMID: 15658141
-
Predictors of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective review.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):554-60. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9194-7. Epub 2008 Feb 12. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18266037
-
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Points of controversy.J Visc Surg. 2014 Sep;151(4):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jul 3. J Visc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24999229 Review.
-
[Differential indications for ileoanal pouch anastomosis : Ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, synchronous colorectal cancer - Crohn's disease, constipation].Chirurg. 2017 Jul;88(7):555-558. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0421-4. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 28405717 Review. German.
References
-
- Nasmyth DG, Williams NS, Johnston D. Comparison of the function of triplicated and duplicated pelvic ileal reservoirs after mucosal proctectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1986;73:361–366. - PubMed
-
- Burns EM, Bottle A, Aylin P, Clark SK, Tekkis PP, Darzi A, et al. Volume analysis of outcome following restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2011;98:408–417. - PubMed
-
- Beliard A, Prudhomme M. Ileal reservoir with ileo-anal anastomosis: Long-term complications. J Visc Surg. 2010;147:137–144. - PubMed
-
- Çetiner S. In: Colon and Rectal Cancers. 1st ed. Baykal A, Zorluoğlu A, Geçim E, Terzi C, editors. İstanbul: 2010. Neoreservoirs; pp. 525–529.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous