Cefazolin prophylaxis in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 25932849
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000789
Cefazolin prophylaxis in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare adipose tissue concentration among obese women receiving 2 g compared with 3 g of precesarean cefazolin prophylaxis.
Methods: This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial of women with singleton gestations and body mass indexes (BMIs) of 30 or greater at their first prenatal visit undergoing cesarean delivery at term. Women were randomly allocated, stratified by BMI, to receive 2 g or 3 g of cefazolin. Subcutaneous adipose tissue was harvested twice: before (opening) fascial incision and after (closing) fascial closure. The primary outcome was opening adipose tissue cefazolin concentration, measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography.
Results: From April 2013 to July 2014, 58 women were enrolled, 57 included in the analysis: 28 in the 2-g group and 29 in the 3-g group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Median opening adipose tissue concentration was similar between the 2-g and 3-g groups (9.4 [interquartile range 5.1-13.4] compared with 11.7 [interquartile range 7-18.3] micrograms/g, P=.12). The percentage of women with opening concentrations above 8 micrograms/g, the minimally inhibitory concentration of cefazolin for Staphylococcus species, was similar (61% compared with 72%, P=.35). All samples were above 2 micrograms/g, the minimally inhibitory concentration for Enterobacteriaceae. Closing adipose tissue concentrations and stratified analyses were consistent with the overall analysis.
Conclusion: In obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylaxis with 3 g of cefazolin did not significantly increase adipose tissue concentration. Thus, our data do not support recommendations for 3-g dosing.
Level of evidence: I.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01810354.
Similar articles
-
Increased 3-gram cefazolin dosing for cesarean delivery prophylaxis in obese women.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):415.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.030. Epub 2015 May 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26003059 Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin prophylaxis in obese gravidae at time of cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):541.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jun 20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26103528 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does current cefazolin dosing achieve adequate tissue and blood concentrations in obese women undergoing cesarean section?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Jan 19. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017. PMID: 28122314
-
Lack of Pharmacokinetic Basis of Weight-Based Dosing and Intra-Operative Re-Dosing with Cefazolin Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese Patients: Implications for Antibiotic Stewardship.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;20(6):439-443. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.039. Epub 2019 May 21. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019. PMID: 31112072 Review.
-
Preincision adjunctive prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):382.e1-382.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.259. Epub 2021 May 5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33964219
Cited by
-
Prophylactic Cefazolin Dosing and Surgical Site Infections: Does the Dose Matter in Obese Patients?Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):159-165. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3497-0. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 30267229 Free PMC article.
-
Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges.Int J Womens Health. 2017 Feb 17;9:81-88. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876. eCollection 2017. Int J Womens Health. 2017. PMID: 28255256 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wound Complications after a Caesarean Section in Obese Women.J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 10;10(4):675. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040675. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33578671 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peripartum care of persons with obesity: a scoping review of recommendations and practical tools for implementation.BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e061430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061430. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36123084 Free PMC article.
-
A validated LC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of cefazolin in human adipose tissue: Application of EMR-Lipid sorbent as an efficient sample clean-up before mass spectrometric analyses.J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022 May 10;213:114696. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114696. Epub 2022 Feb 28. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022. PMID: 35259713 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Toma O, Suntrup P, Stefanescu A, London A, Mutch M, Kharasch E. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection. Anesth Analg 2011;113:730–7.
-
- Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Burstin H, et al.. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(suppl 1):S51–61.
-
- Tita AT, Rouse DJ, Blackwell S, Saade GR, Spong CY, Andrews WW. Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:675–82.
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013;62:1–69, 72.
-
- Dinsmoor MJ, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, Varner MW, et al.. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for nonlaboring cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:752–6.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous