Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 May 4:15:7.
doi: 10.1186/s12895-015-0027-9.

Topical treatment with fresh human milk versus emollient on atopic eczema spots in young children: a small, randomized, split body, controlled, blinded pilot study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Topical treatment with fresh human milk versus emollient on atopic eczema spots in young children: a small, randomized, split body, controlled, blinded pilot study

Teresa Løvold Berents et al. BMC Dermatol. .

Abstract

Background: Public health nurses report on effects of fresh human milk as treatment for conjunctivitis, rhinitis and atopic eczema (AE), the latter being highly prevalent in early childhood. Emollients and topical corticosteroids are first line treatment of AE. As many caregivers have steroid phobia, alternative treatment options for mild AE are of interest. The aim of this small pilot study was to assess the potential effects and risks of applying fresh human milk locally on eczema spots in children with AE.

Methods: This was a split body, controlled, randomized and physician blinded pilot study, of children with AE with two similar contralateral eczema spots having a mother breastfeeding the child or a sibling. Fresh expressed milk and emollient was applied on the intervention spot and emollient alone on the control area, three times a day for four weeks. The severity and area of the eczema spots was evaluated weekly, and samples from milk and the spots were analysed weekly with respect to bacterial colonisation.

Results: Of nine patients included, six completed the study. Mean age at inclusion was 18.5 months. The spots examined were localized on the arms, legs or cheeks. The spots were similar in severity, but differed in area. In one patient the eczema ceased after inclusion. In four patients both control and intervention areas increased during the intervention. The relative change in eczema area compared to baseline showed less increase in the intervention spots in two patients, whereas the opposite was observed in three. In four children Staphylococcus aureus was found in their eczema once or more. In three of the 28 human milk samples, Staphylococcus aureus, alfa haemolytic streptococci or coagulase negative staphylococci were detected. Staphylococcus aureus was found once both in human milk and in the eczema spots, no clinical signs of infection were however observed. No secondary infection due to milk application was detected.

Conclusion: In this small pilot study, no effect was found on eczema spots treated with topical application of fresh human milk. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT02381028 ).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram. Nine children with atopic eczema and bilateral eczema lesions were assessed for eligibility to a small split body, controlled, physician blinded pilot study evaluating human milk and emollient versus emollient alone on eczema lesions. Three children were lost to follow up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in eczema area. This figure illustrates the weekly difference between control and intervention sites based on the area change from baseline in six children with atopic eczema included in a split body, controlled, physician blinded pilot study evaluating human milk and emollient versus emollient alone on eczema lesions. Each line represents one child. The difference is calculated as: control area week 1, 2, 3 or 4 divided by control area at week 0 minus intervention area week 1, 2, 3 or 4 divided by intervention area at week 0. Lines above zero represent improvement of the intervention area, and lines below zero represent the relative increase of the eczema areas of the intervention sites.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Odhiambo JA, Williams HC, Clayton TO, Robertson CF, Asher MI. Global variations in prevalence of eczema symptoms in children from ISAAC phase three. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(6):1251–58 e1223. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(14):1483–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra074081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leyden JJ, Marples RR, Kligman AM. Staphylococcus aureus in the lesions of atopic dermatitis. British J Dermatol. 1974;90(5):525–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1974.tb06447.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, Krol A, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kojima R, Fujiwara T, Matsuda A, Narita M, Matsubara O, Nonoyama S, et al. Factors associated with steroid phobia in caregivers of children with atopic dermatitis. Pediat Dermatol. 2013;30(1):29–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2012.01808.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data