Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Sep;213(3):352.e1-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

A population-based study of US women's preferred versus usual sources of reproductive health care

Kelli Stidham Hall  1 , Elizabeth W Patton  2 , Halley P Crissman  3 , Melissa K Zochowski  4 , Vanessa K Dalton  5
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A population-based study of US women's preferred versus usual sources of reproductive health care

Kelli Stidham Hall et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: We characterized US women's preferred and usual sources of reproductive health care.

Study design: Data were drawn from the Women's Health Care Experiences and Preferences Study, an Internet survey of 1078 women aged 18-55 years randomly sampled from a national probability panel. We described and compared women's preferred and usual sources of care (women's health specialists including obstetricians-gynecologists and family-planning clinics, primary care, other) for Papanicolaou/pelvic examination, contraception, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) services using χ(2), logistic regression, and kappa statistics.

Results: Among women reporting health service utilization (n = 984, 92% overall; 77% Papanicolaou/pelvic; 33% contraception; 8% STI), women's health specialists were the most used sources of care for Papanicolaou/pelvic (68%), contraception (74%), and STI (75%) services. Women's health specialists were also the most preferred care sources for Papanicolaou/pelvic (68%), contraception (49%), and STI (35%) services, whereas the remainder of women preferred primary care/other sources or not to get care. Differences in preferred and usual care sources were noted across sociodemographic groups, including insurance status and income level (P < .05). Preference for women's health specialists was the strongest predictor of women's health specialist utilization for Papanicolaou/pelvic (adjusted odds ratio, 48.8; 95% confidence interval, 25.9-91.8; P < .001) and contraceptive (adjusted odds ratio, 194.5; 95% confidence interval, 42.3-894.6; P < .001) services. Agreement between preferred and usual-care sources was high for Papanicolaou/pelvic (85%, kappa, 0.63) and contraception (86%; kappa, 0.64) services; disagreement (range, 15-22%) was associated with insurance, employment, income, race, and religion (P < .05).

Conclusion: Women's preferences for and use of women's health specialists for reproductive health care has implications for efforts to define the role of obstetricians-gynecologists and family planning clinics in current health systems.

Keywords: health service preferences; reproductive health care; women’s health service utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Accessed March 2, 2014];Women's preventive services guidelines. http://www.hrsa.gov/womensguidelines/
    1. Berkowitz Z, Saraiya M, Sawaya GF. Cervical cancer screening intervals, 2006 to 2009: moving beyond annual testing. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:922–924. - PubMed
    1. Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Harris R, Starkey M, Denberg TD the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Screening pelvic examination in adult women: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(1):67–72. - PubMed
    1. Gee RE, Brindis CD, Diaz A, Garcia F, Gregory K, Peck MG, Reece EA. Recommendations of the IOM clinical preventive services for women committee: implications for obstetricians and gynecologists. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(6):471–80. - PubMed
    1. Henderson JT, Weisman CS, Grason H. Are two doctors better than one? Women's physician use and appropriate care. Women's Health Issues. 2002;12(3):138–49. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms