Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;62(3):494-501.
doi: 10.1109/tuffc.2014.006828.

Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents

Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents

Sujeethraj Koppolu et al. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) may expel their encapsulated gas subject to ultrasound-induced shell buckling or rupture. Nonlinear oscillations of this gas bubble can produce a subharmonic component in the ultrasound backscatter. This study investigated the relationship between this gas-release mechanism and shell-thickness-to-radius ratios (STRRs) of polymer-shelled UCAs. Three types of polylactide-shelled UCAs with STRRs of 7.5, 40, and 100 nm/μm were studied. Each UCA population had a nominal mean diameter of 2 μm. UCAs were subjected to increasing static overpressure ranging from 2 to 330 kPa over a duration of 2 h in a custom-designed test chamber while being imaged using a 200× magnification video microscope at a frame rate of 5 frames/s. Digitized video images were binarized and processed to obtain the cross-sectional area of individual UCAs. Integration of the normalized cross-sectional area over normalized time, defined as buckling factor (Bf), provided a dimensionless parameter for quantifying and comparing the degree of pre-rupture buckling exhibited by the UCAs of different STRRs in response to overpressure. The UCAs with an STRR of 7.5 nm/μm exhibited a distinct shell-buckling phase before shell rupture (Bf < 1), whereas the UCAs with higher STRRs (40 and 100 nm/μm) did not undergo significant prerupture buckling (Bf ≈ 1). The difference in the overpressure response was correlated with the subharmonic response produced by these UCAs. When excited using 20-MHz ultrasound, individual UCAs (N = 3000) in populations that did not exhibit a buckling phase produced a subharmonic response that was an order of magnitude greater than the UCA population with a prominent pre-rupture buckling phase. These results indicate the mechanism of gas expulsion from these UCAs might be a relevant factor in determining the level of subharmonic response in response to high-frequency ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic of the experimental setup for the overpressure study. Changes in the morphology of UCAs subjected to static overpressures in a glycerol-filled chamber were observed with a video microscope.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for UCA-backscatter study. Individual UCAs were passed through the focal region of a 20-MHz transducer and their responses to 20-MHz, 20-cycle tonebursts were recorded.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sequence of images showing buckling and subsequent rupture with the corresponding pressure values for the three types of UCAs.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) The area under the curve of normalized area versus normalized time gives the buckling factor (Bf). Illustration of the difference in buckling factors for UCAs with lower STRR (PB127) and higher STRR (PH37). (b) ANOVA analysis of Bf values for the three UCA types.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Buckling and rupture pressures for the three UCA types.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
SHS computed from backscatter measurements of individual UCAs for the three UCA types in response to a 20-MHz, 20-cycle tone-burst excitation. Data were taken from [18].

References

    1. Ophir J, Parker KJ. Contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1989;15(4):319–333. - PubMed
    1. Goldberg BB, Liu J, Forsberg F. Ultrasound contrast agents: A review. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1994;20(4):319–333. - PubMed
    1. Goertz DE, Frijlink ME, de Jong N, van der Steen A. Nonlinear intravascular ultrasound contrast imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006;32(4):491–502. - PubMed
    1. Bouakaz A, Frigstad S, Ten Cate FJ, de Jong N. Super harmonic imaging: A new imaging technique for improved contrast detection. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2002;28(1):59–68. - PubMed
    1. Faez T, Emmer M, Docter M, Sijl J, Versluis M, de Jong N. Characterizing the subharmonic response of phospholipid-coated microbubbles for carotid imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2011;37(6):958–970. - PubMed

Publication types