Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Jun;29(2):141-8.

Validity of anthropometric equations for determination of changes in body composition in adult males during training

  • PMID: 2593652

Validity of anthropometric equations for determination of changes in body composition in adult males during training

C J Cisar et al. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1989 Jun.

Abstract

Twenty-six males (26.5 +/- 6.0 yr; X +/- SD) were studied before and after a fourteen week endurance training program to determine the validity of anthropometric equations for estimating changes in body composition (BC). Anthropometric measures included skinfolds (SF), circumferences, and diameters. Body density (BD) was determined by underwater weighing corrected for residual lung volume. Training resulted in an increase in BD (1.061 +/- 0.002 to 1.067 +/- 0.002 g/ml; X +/- SEM) and decreases in body weight (73.0 +/- 2.1 to 71.4 +/- 2.0 kg), relative fat (16.6 +/- 0.9 to 14.1 +/- 0.8%), fat weight (12.4 +/- 1.0 to 10.2 +/- 0.8 kg), and seventeen of the anthropometric measures (p less than 0.05). Cross-validation of twenty-four equations revealed validity coefficients (r2) and total error in relative fat (RFE) of r2 = 0.40-0.77 and RFE = 2.60-10.15% before training and r2 = 0.14-0.61 and RFE = 2.62-9.45% after training. Linear and base 10 logarithmic (log10) equations using primarily SF measures tended to have higher r2 and lower RFE than equations based on quadratic and natural logarithmic (loge) models and other anthropometric measures. Paired t-tests revealed that of these equations with higher r2 and lower RFE, only the linear equation by Forsyth & Sinning (BD = 1.10647--0.00162(scapSF)--0.00144(abdSF)--0.00077(triSF++ +) + 0.00071(midaxSF] was a stable predictor of BD during training. These results suggest that many existing equations may not be accurate predictors of changes in BC during training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by