Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul:43:131-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

Transgenerational inheritance of metabolic disease

Affiliations
Review

Transgenerational inheritance of metabolic disease

Rachel Stegemann et al. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Metabolic disease encompasses several disorders including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Recently, the incidence of metabolic disease has drastically increased, driven primarily by a worldwide obesity epidemic. Transgenerational inheritance remains controversial, but has been proposed to contribute to human metabolic disease risk based on a growing number of proof-of-principle studies in model organisms ranging from Caenorhabditis elegans to Mus musculus to Sus scrofa. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that heritable risk is epigenetically transmitted from parent to offspring over multiple generations in the absence of a continued exposure to the triggering stimuli. A diverse assortment of initial triggers can induce transgenerational inheritance including high-fat or high-sugar diets, low-protein diets, various toxins, and ancestral genetic variants. Although the mechanistic basis underlying the transgenerational inheritance of disease risk remains largely unknown, putative molecules mediating transmission include small RNAs, histone modifications, and DNA methylation. Due to the considerable impact of metabolic disease on human health, it is critical to better understand the role of transgenerational inheritance of metabolic disease risk to open new avenues for therapeutic intervention and improve upon the current methods for clinical diagnoses and treatment.

Keywords: Epigenetics; Epigenome; Intergenerational inheritance; Metabolism; Obesity; Transgenerational inheritance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Characteristics of epigenetic and conventional inheritance patterns
The red arrow indicates a triggering event (genetic or environmental) in the F0 generation. Obesity is shown as a representative phenotype. Although the F0 mice are represented as obese, the triggering event need not induce a phenotype in the F0 generation and may instead be restricted to future offspring. Phenotypic transmission to offspring is indicated by an obese mouse in the F1-F2 generations, whereas a lean mouse in the F1-F2 generations indicates failure to transmit the phenotype. Intergenerational inheritance describes phenotypic transmission to the F1 generation. Transgenerational inheritance describes phenotypic transmission to the F2 generation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Characteristics of epigenetic and conventional inheritance patterns in pregnant females
The red arrow indicates a triggering event (genetic or environmental) in the F0 generation. Obesity is shown as a representative phenotype. Although the F0 mice are represented as obese, the triggering event need not induce a phenotype in the F0 generation and may instead be restricted to future offspring. Phenotypic transmission to offspring is indicated by an obese mouse in the F1-F3 generations, whereas a lean mouse in the F1-F3 generations indicates failure to transmit the phenotype. Intergenerational inheritance describes phenotypic transmission to the F1 or F2 generation. Transgenerational inheritance describes phenotypic transmission to the F3 generation, due to the presence of germ cells in utero of the F0 female that will eventually develop in the F2 generation.

References

    1. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365:1415–28. - PubMed
    1. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. The Lancet. 2011;377:557–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity in the United States. JAMA. 2014;312:189–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6228. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Measuring the Global Burden of Disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:448–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1201534. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. 2014;384:766–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources