Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul-Dec;5(2):166-71.
doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.154821.

Antibiotics in third molar extraction; are they really necessary: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Ankit Arora  1 , Ajoy Roychoudhury  1 , Ongkila Bhutia  1 , Sandeep Pandey  1 , Surender Singh  2 , Bimal K Das  3
Affiliations

Antibiotics in third molar extraction; are they really necessary: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Ankit Arora et al. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul-Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Antibiotic resistance is now a serious problem, although it was not so only a few years ago. The need of the hour is to give clear evidence of the efficacy of antibiotic use, or lack thereof, to the surgeon for a procedure as common as mandibular third molar surgery.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate whether postoperative combined amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in mandibular third molar extraction is effective in preventing inflammatory complications.

Study and design: The study was structured as a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Materials and methods: A study was designed wherein the 96 units (two bilaterally similar impacted mandibular third molars per head in 48 patients) were randomly assigned to two treatment groups (Group I and Group II). Each patient served as his/her own control. Each patient received 625 mg of combined amoxicillin and clavulanic acid 1 h before surgery. In the case of third molars belonging to Group I, 625 mg of combined amoxicillin and clavulanic acid TDS was continued for 3 days; in Group II, placebo in similar-looking packs was continued for 3 days. The patients were evaluated on the third and seventh postoperative days for signs of clinical infection and for microbial load evaluation.

Statistical analysis: The data between the two groups were statistically analyzed by the two-tailed Fisher's exact test, with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: The difference was not statistically significant between the test group and the control group with regard to erythema, dehiscence, swelling, pain, trismus, and infection based on microbial load. The data were statistically significant for alveolar osteitis, with the occurrence of alveolar osteitis (14.58%) in the placebo group.

Conclusion: Postoperative antibiotics are recommended only for patients undergoing contaminated, long-duration surgery.

Keywords: Antibiotics; infection; mandibular third molars; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Graph 1
Graph 1
Flow of the study
Graph 2
Graph 2
Flowchart showing flow of participants through each stage
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ataoğlu H, Oz GY, Candirli C, Kiziloğlu D. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary during operations to remove third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:133–5. - PubMed
    1. Piecuch JF, Arzadon J, Lieblich SE. Prophylactic antibiotics for third molar surgery: A supportive opinion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:53–60. - PubMed
    1. Poeschl PW, Eckel D, Poeschl E. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment in third molar surgery–a necessity? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:3–9. - PubMed
    1. Zeitler DL. Prophylactic antibiotics for third molar surgery: A dissenting opinion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:61–4. - PubMed
    1. Halpern LR, Dodson TB. Does prophylactic administration of systemic antibiotics prevent postoperative inflammatory complications after third molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:177–85. - PubMed