Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Jan;30(1):315-22.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4211-0. Epub 2015 May 5.

Laparoscopic suturing learning curve in an open versus closed box trainer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Laparoscopic suturing learning curve in an open versus closed box trainer

S P Rodrigues et al. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of training under direct vision prior to training with indirect vision on the learning curve of the laparoscopic suture task.

Methods: Novices were randomized in two groups. Group 1 performed three suturing tasks in a transparent laparoscopic box trainer under direct vision followed by three suturing tasks in a standard non-transparent laparoscopic box trainer equipped with a 0° laparoscope. Group 2 performed six suturing tasks in a standard laparoscopic box trainer. Performance time, motion analysis parameters (economy of movements) and interaction force parameters (tissue handling) were measured. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing: self-perceived dexterity before and after the training, their experienced frustration and the difficulty of the training.

Results: A total of 34 participants were included, one was excluded because of incomplete training. Group 1 used significantly less time to complete the total of six tasks (27 %). At the end of the training, there were no differences in motion or force parameters between the two groups. Group 2 rated their self-perceived dexterity after the training significantly lower than before the training and also reported significantly higher levels of frustration compared to group 1. Both groups rated the difficulty of the training similar.

Conclusion: Novices benefit from starting their training of difficult basic laparoscopic skills, e.g., suturing, in a transparent box trainer without camera. It takes less time to complete the tasks, and they get less frustrated by the training with the same results on their economy of movements and tissue handling skills.

Keywords: Endoscopy; Surgical; Technical; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Physical box trainer (LUMC, Leiden). A Experimental (open) setup with transparent top so that the novices could look at the task under direct (3D) vision. B Standard (closed) setup: the transparent top was covered with a non-transparent plate and the image of a 0° scope was presented on a monitor in a fixed position (2D vision)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Step-by-step overview of the suture task performed in each trial. During phase 1, the needle is driven through the artificial tissue in a pre-marked area. During phase 2, a standardized three throw square knot is formed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Learning curves of phase 1, the needle driving phase. In group 1, trial 3 is the last task in the open box trainer (with transparent top) before they switch to a standard (closed) box trainer. A Time. B and C Left and right path length. D and E Left and right volume. F Mean force nonzero. G Maximum force. H Force volume. *P < 0.05
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Learning curves of phase 2, the knot tying phase. In group 1, trial 3 is the last task in the open box trainer (with transparent top) before they switch to a standard (closed) box trainer. A Time. B and C Left and right path length. D and E Left and right volume. F Mean force nonzero. G Maximum force. H Force volume. *P < 0.05

References

    1. Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A. Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1549–1558. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4816. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–463. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91:146–150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4407. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:272–283. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00339-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolkman W, Van de Put MA, Van den Hout WB, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Implementation of the laparoscopic simulator in a gynecological residency curriculum. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1363–1368. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9120-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources