Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 30;12(5):4796-815.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph120504796.

Toxicity assessment of refill liquids for electronic cigarettes

Affiliations

Toxicity assessment of refill liquids for electronic cigarettes

Vincent Varlet et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

We analyzed 42 models from 14 brands of refill liquids for e-cigarettes for the presence of micro-organisms, diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, hydrocarbons, ethanol, aldehydes, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, and solvents. All the liquids under scrutiny complied with norms for the absence of yeast, mold, aerobic microbes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diethylene glycol, ethylene glycol and ethanol were detected, but remained within limits authorized for food and pharmaceutical products. Terpenic compounds and aldehydes were found in the products, in particular formaldehyde and acrolein. No sample contained nitrosamines at levels above the limit of detection (1 μg/g). Residual solvents such as 1,3-butadiene, cyclohexane and acetone, to name a few, were found in some products. None of the products under scrutiny were totally exempt of potentially toxic compounds. However, for products other than nicotine, the oral acute toxicity of the e-liquids tested seems to be of minor concern. However, a minority of liquids, especially those with flavorings, showed particularly high ranges of chemicals, causing concerns about their potential toxicity in case of chronic oral exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brown J., West R., Beard E., Michie S., Shahab L., McNeill A. Prevalence and characteristics of e-cigarette users in Great Britain: Findings from a general population survey of smokers. Addict. Behav. 2014;39:1120–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.03.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hajek P., Etter J.F., Benowitz N., Eissenberg T., McRobbie H. Electronic cigarettes: Review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefits. Addiction. 2014;109:1801–1810. doi: 10.1111/add.12659. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Etter J.F., Bullen C., Flouris A.D., Laugesen M., Eissenberg T. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: A research agenda. Tob. Control. 2011;20:243–248. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.042168. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Regan A.K., Promoff G., Dube S.R., Arrazola R. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: Adult use and awareness of the “e-cigarette” in the USA. Tob. Control. 2011;22:19–23. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pearson J.L., Richardson A., Niaura R.S., Vallone D.M., Abrams D.B. e-Cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. Am. J. Public Health. 2012;102:1758–1766. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300526. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms