Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr 30;7(5):3154-65.
doi: 10.3390/nu7053154.

Enteral nutrition in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a literature review

Affiliations
Review

Enteral nutrition in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a literature review

Salvatore Buscemi et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is considered the gold standard treatment for periampullory carcinomas. This procedure presents 30%-40% of morbidity. Patients who have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy often present perioperative malnutrition that is worse in the early postoperative days, affects the process of healing, the intestinal barrier function and the number of postoperative complications. Few studies focus on the relation between enteral nutrition (EN) and postoperative complications. Our aim was to perform a review, including only randomized controlled trial meta-analyses or well-designed studies, of evidence regarding the correlation between EN and main complications and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy, as delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), length of stay and infectious complications. Several studies, especially randomized controlled trial have shown that EN does not increase the rate of DGE. EN appeared safe and tolerated for patients after PD, even if it did not reveal any advantages in terms of POPF, PPH, length of stay and infectious complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lewis S.J., Andersen H.K., Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery vs. later commencement of feeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2009;13:569–575. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0592-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nygren J., Thorell A., Ljungqvist O. New developments facilitating nutritional intake after gastrointestinal surgery. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2003;6:593–597. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200309000-00015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braga M., Ljungqvist O., Soeters P., Fearon K., Weimann A., Bozzetti F., ESPEN ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: Surgery. Clin. Nutr. 2009;28:378–386. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wente M.N., Shrikhande S.V., Müller M.W., Diener M.K., Seiler C.M., Friess H., Büchler M.W. Pancreaticojejunostomy vs. pancreaticogastrostomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Surg. 2007;193:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Correia M.I., Caiaffa W.T., da Silva A.L., Waitzberg D.L. Risk factors for malnutrition in patients undergoing gastroenterological and hernia surgery: An analysis of 374 patients. Nutr. Hosp. 2001;16:59–64. - PubMed