Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark
- PMID: 25944711
- PMCID: PMC4537675
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29593
Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark
Abstract
Delivery of screening mammography differs substantially between the United States (US) and Denmark. We evaluated whether there are differences in screening sensitivity and specificity. We included screens from women screened at age 50-69 years during 1996-2008/2009 in the US Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) (n = 2,872,791), and from two population-based mammography screening programs in Denmark (Copenhagen, n = 148,156 and Funen, n = 275,553). Women were followed-up for 1 year. For initial screens, recall rate was significantly higher in BCSC (17.6%) than in Copenhagen (4.3%) and Funen (3.1%). Sensitivity was fairly similar in BCSC (91.8%) and Copenhagen (90.5%) and Funen (92.5%). At subsequent screens, recall rates were 8.8%, 1.8% and 1.4% in BCSC, Copenhagen and Funen, respectively. The BCSC sensitivity (82.3%) was lower compared with that in Copenhagen (88.9%) and Funen (86.9%), but when stratified by time since last screen, the sensitivity was similar. For both initial and subsequent screenings, the specificity of screening in BCSC (83.2% and 91.6%) was significantly lower than that in Copenhagen (96.6% and 98.8%) and Funen (97.9% and 99.2%). By taking time since last screen into account, it was found that American and Danish women had the same probability of having their asymptomatic cancers detected at screening. However, the majority of women free of asymptomatic cancers experienced more harms in terms of false-positive findings in the US than in Denmark.
Keywords: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium; mammographic performance; mass screening; sensitivity; specificity.
© 2015 UICC.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Comparison of cumulative false-positive risk of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;39(4):656-63. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 23. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 26013768 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14570948
-
Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.APMIS Suppl. 1998;83:1-44. APMIS Suppl. 1998. PMID: 9850674
-
Screening mammography in women less than age 50 years.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;24(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834da49a. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22037165 Review.
-
Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe.Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003 Jun;12(3):213-22. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200306000-00008. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003. PMID: 12771560 Review.
Cited by
-
Function-related Indicators and Outcomes of Screening Mammography in Older Women: Evidence from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Aug;30(8):1582-1590. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0152. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021. PMID: 34078641 Free PMC article.
-
Advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the localization and diagnostics of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023 Nov 15;24(11):985-997. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2300019. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023. PMID: 37961801 Free PMC article.
-
Circulating cell-free DNA-based methylation patterns for breast cancer diagnosis.NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Aug 16;7(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00316-7. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34400642 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility Preservation in BRCA1/2 Germline Mutation Carriers: An Overview.Life (Basel). 2024 May 10;14(5):615. doi: 10.3390/life14050615. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38792636 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is the development of liquid biopsy for the early detection and the monitoring of breast cancers on its way of overtaking mammography?Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 9;11:1415940. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1415940. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39185467 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2012: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 - PubMed
-
- U.S Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–236. - PubMed
-
- American Cancer Society [January 30, 2015];Paying for breast cancer screening. 2014 Availible at http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerea...
-
- Jacobsen KK, Von Euler-Chelpin M. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012;34:272–78. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical