Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov 1;137(9):2198-207.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.29593. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark

Katja Kemp Jacobsen et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Delivery of screening mammography differs substantially between the United States (US) and Denmark. We evaluated whether there are differences in screening sensitivity and specificity. We included screens from women screened at age 50-69 years during 1996-2008/2009 in the US Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) (n = 2,872,791), and from two population-based mammography screening programs in Denmark (Copenhagen, n = 148,156 and Funen, n = 275,553). Women were followed-up for 1 year. For initial screens, recall rate was significantly higher in BCSC (17.6%) than in Copenhagen (4.3%) and Funen (3.1%). Sensitivity was fairly similar in BCSC (91.8%) and Copenhagen (90.5%) and Funen (92.5%). At subsequent screens, recall rates were 8.8%, 1.8% and 1.4% in BCSC, Copenhagen and Funen, respectively. The BCSC sensitivity (82.3%) was lower compared with that in Copenhagen (88.9%) and Funen (86.9%), but when stratified by time since last screen, the sensitivity was similar. For both initial and subsequent screenings, the specificity of screening in BCSC (83.2% and 91.6%) was significantly lower than that in Copenhagen (96.6% and 98.8%) and Funen (97.9% and 99.2%). By taking time since last screen into account, it was found that American and Danish women had the same probability of having their asymptomatic cancers detected at screening. However, the majority of women free of asymptomatic cancers experienced more harms in terms of false-positive findings in the US than in Denmark.

Keywords: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium; mammographic performance; mass screening; sensitivity; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of recall rates, sensitivity and specificity after initial and subsequent screens presented as age-standardized rates (World 2000-2025) for screening mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC), United States, and in the organized programs in Copenhagen and Funen, Denmark CI: Confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2012: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 - PubMed
    1. U.S Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–236. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society [January 30, 2015];Paying for breast cancer screening. 2014 Availible at http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerea...
    1. Jacobsen KK, Von Euler-Chelpin M. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012;34:272–78. - PubMed
    1. Hofvind S, Vacek PM, Skelly J, Weaver DL, Geller BM. Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1082–91. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types